The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

How Abramovich was forced to sell Chelsea

Oligarch frozen out of U.K., club after Ukraine invaded.

- By Rob Harris

Standing by the bar in a small Stamford Bridge hospitalit­y suite was a figure who had not been spotted at the stadium in three years: Roman Abramovich.

Last November, the Chelsea owner was back in London at his English Premier League club to host the president of Israel. There was no obvious security entourage around the Russian billionair­e and little fuss, just close associate and Chelsea director Euguene Tenenbaum.

After making small talk with guests and posing for photos with President Isaac Herzog in front of the pitch, the party moved onto an afternoon tea event for around 50 people, with scones and cucumber sandwiches.

Abramovich was feted with speeches praising his work through Chelsea to campaign against antisemiti­sm. It looked like the gradual reintroduc­tion of Abramovich

into a more high-profile role around Chelsea again, attached to his social activism.

There was, maybe, a British visa to be regained after he withdrew his applicatio­n for a renewal in 2018.

Then everything rapidly changed after Feb. 24, when Russia invaded Ukraine.

Three months later, Abramovich is being replaced as Chelsea owner by a group fronted by American investor Todd Boehly, a prospect unimaginab­le when the oligarch was on the field in Abu Dhabi on Feb. 9 lifting the FIFA Club World Cup.

It would turn out to be the 21st and last men’s team trophy in 19 years running the team his wealth transforme­d from being glamorous but only occasional­ly competing for the biggest trophies, into one of the most successful in European football.

Abramovich tried to cling onto Chelsea, even as anger over Russia’s unprovoked aggression toward its neighbor intensifie­d, backed not just by loyal fans but club greats including John Terry hailing him as “the best.”

Within hours of the war

beginning, Abramovich was accused in the House of Commons of having links to corrupt activity and paying for political influence in Russia. The demands grew for Abramovich to be sanctioned by the British government, which had already thwarted his efforts to regain the visa in recent years, according to a legislator.

Sensing the need to act, Abramovich offered cosmetic changes to the ownership Feb. 26, with the pledge to relinquish “stewardshi­p and

care” of the club to its charitable foundation trustees. They had not signed off on the plan, though, and the vague proposal did not quell the anger that a man accused of being so closely linked to Russian President Vladimir Putin could retain the ownership of a high-profile status symbol in the heart of London.

Another public play to shield his reputation from Putin’s war came Feb. 28 when Abramovich’s PR team pushed an apparent move for him to broker peace. Abramovich did not condemn the war, and he has yet to do so despite talking about the need to publicly condemn atrocities only two days before the invasion. The rare comments came in a statement launching a new partnershi­p backing the Jerusalem-based Holocaust museum.

“Yad Vashem’s work in preserving the memory of the victims of the Holocaust,” Abramovich said, “is instrument­al to ensure that future generation­s never forget what antisemiti­sm, racism and hate can lead to if we don’t speak out.”

Yet, Abramovich never has practiced what he preached, even as the death toll mounted in Ukraine and areas were reduced to rubble by Russian bombing and shelling. Yad Vashem suspended its partnershi­p with Abramovich, as did the Imperial War Museum in London, where he funded a Holocaust exhibition, and which hosted an event for him hours after the start of Russia’s war on Ukraine.

It was only six days into the invasion when Swiss billionair­e Hansjorg Wyss leaked that Abramovich was actually trying to quickly dispose of Chelsea and the club was publicly put up for sale.

“I hope,” Abramovich said, “that I will be able to visit Stamford Bridge one last time to say goodbye to all of you in person.”

A week later, any immediate hopes of returning to London were ended by the government. Sanctions and travel restrictio­ns were placed on Abramovich, his assets were frozen, and Chelsea was allowed to operate only under the terms of a government-issued license until the end of May.

New match tickets couldn’t be sold by Chelsea. Players couldn’t be handed new contracts. Even merchandis­e stores had to close.

The job of finding a buyer for Chelsea was placed with the New York-based Raine Group merchant bank. An array of prospectiv­e investors went public, some seemingly more viable owners than others, before the bank produced a shortlist of four bidders in early April. The sale ended where it began, with Wyss.

 ?? AP 2021 ?? After 19 years as owner of the Chelsea soccer club, Roman Abramovich had to give up the English team because of his associatio­n with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
AP 2021 After 19 years as owner of the Chelsea soccer club, Roman Abramovich had to give up the English team because of his associatio­n with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States