The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Mining firm sues over Okefenokee mine ruling

Suit fights Army Corps’ reassertio­n of federal control.

- By Drew Kann drew.kann@ajc.com

The company behind a yearslong quest to mine for titanium at the edge of the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge in southeast Georgia has filed a new lawsuit over a recent ruling that restored federal oversight of the project.

In a sign of President Joe Biden’s emphasis on envi- ronmental protection, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on June 3 reversed a decision made during the Trump administra­tion that had left the project’s fate up to Georgia’s Environmen­tal Protection Divi- sion. The new determinat­ion means that to move forward, the mine will have to clear the high bar of a comprehens­ive review by the Corps, likely to take years to complete.

But a lawsuit filed last week by Alabama-based Twin Pines Minerals LLC — which wants to extract titanium from soils near the Okefenokee Swamp — challenges the Corps’ decision to reassert federal control.

The company wants to mine on a 740-acre segment of Trail Ridge, an ancient sand dune complex that runs along the swamp’s eastern edge. But environmen­tal groups and outside experts on hydrology have long warned that min- ing in the area could drain the swamp and permanentl­y damage the fragile ecosystem.

In a complaint filed last week in U.S. District Court, lawyers for Twin Pines argue that their planned mine, located within 3 miles of the swamp, will have no effect on water levels. The lawsuit called the Corps’ decision “unlawful and unwarrante­d.”

At the center of the case is whether the Muscogee (Creek) Nation — one of the Native American tribes for whom the Okefenokee Swamp has huge cultural and historical significan­ce — was properly consulted when the decision to remove federal oversight was made.

In its June 3 memo, the Corps said it was rescinding its ruling because the govern- ment failed to formally solicit feedback from the tribe.

But Twin Pines’ lawyers say the tribes’ views are irrel- evant to the Corps’ determinat­ion on whether it has juris- diction over the mine. They also claim the Corps made its decision without know- ing whether the tribe had any new or pertinent informatio­n that could have affected the initial ruling.

Twin Pines declined to comment on the case. Muscogee (Creek) Nation offices were closed Monday for a tribal holiday, and attempts to contact the tribe were unsuccessf­ul. The Army Corpsof Engineers did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

Megan Huynh, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmen­tal Law Center — one of several organizati­ons involved in fighting the proposed mine — said the Corps made the right decision in June and said it was up to Twin Pines to prove its mining plan is safe.

“Despite Twin Pines’ repeated attempts over the years to move the goal posts and avoid fundamenta­l environmen­tal requiremen­ts intended to protect iconic places like the Okefenokee, the fact remains that the company has not and cannot show that its proposed mine would not cause irreparabl­e harm,” she said.

 ?? STEPHEN B. MORTON/AP 2022 ?? Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, one of the world’s largest intact freshwater ecosystems, averages 300,000 visitors a year. A company wants to mine on a 740-acre segment of Trail Ridge, an ancient sand dune complex along the swamp’s eastern edge.
STEPHEN B. MORTON/AP 2022 Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, one of the world’s largest intact freshwater ecosystems, averages 300,000 visitors a year. A company wants to mine on a 740-acre segment of Trail Ridge, an ancient sand dune complex along the swamp’s eastern edge.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States