The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Senate panel creates rules for mass voter challenges

GOP-sponsored eligibilit­y proposal advances to final votes.

- By Mark Niesse Mark.Niesse@ajc.com

A Georgia Senate committee moved forward with a bill Thursday that reinforces the ability of conservati­ve activists to challenge the eligibilit­y of voters who appear to have moved but protects voter registrati­ons from being questioned just before an election.

The Republican-sponsored proposal sets criteria for voter challenges after activists disputed more than 100,000 voter registrati­ons in the wake of Georgia’s 2021 election law, which allowed any resident to contest unlimited registrati­ons within their counties. County election boards have rejected most of those challenges.

The Senate Ethics Committee approved the bill 5-3, with Republican­s in support and Democrats opposed.

Under the bill, voter challenges would be upheld if a Georgia voter registers in another state, claims a homestead exemption in a different jurisdicti­on or registers at a non-residentia­l address. Challenges wouldn’t be considered within 45 days of an election, and they couldn’t target college students, members of the military and out-of-state government employees who temporaril­y have moved from Georgia. Change-ofaddress informatio­n couldn’t be used as the sole source for sustaining a challenge.

Election officials routinely cancel outdated registrati­ons, but the process can take years because state and federal laws include notificati­on requiremen­ts and waiting periods to ensure voters aren’t incorrectl­y removed.

Voter challenges can speed up the government’s regular process of removing outdated registrati­ons, but there have been several cases of erroneous challenges that canceled voters who were eligible Georgia residents.

Georgia has 7.95 million registered voters, and the state canceled 189,000 inactive voter registrati­ons last year.

“(The bill) strikes a balance between those who feel that some electors are not appropriat­e or are legitimate. It requires the challenger to have reasonable evidence,” said Ethics Chairman Max Burns, R-Sylvania. “It’s hard to argue if you have a voter who’s deceased. It’s hard to argue if you have a voter who is registered and voted in another jurisdicti­on. It’s hard to argue if you have a voter who’s changed their homestead.”

Activists who have filed mass voter challenges say outdated registrati­ons could be used for election fraud, but very few cases of ineligible voting have been proved in recent years. Georgia law requires all voters to show ID before they cast a ballot.

Democrats said Georgia’s voter challenge system could be used against legitimate voters who haven’t moved, jeopardizi­ng their ability to participat­e in elections.

“We’ve been seeing these mass voter challenges” in response to Georgia’s voting law passed three years ago, said state Sen. Harold Jones, D-Augusta. “(The bill) is basically part of continuing to challenge voters over and over.”

Sweeping voter challenges gained popularity among conservati­ve activists who say they fear the possibilit­y of voter fraud since Republican Donald Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidenti­al election.

The voter challenge measure, House Bill 976, is one of nine pending bills that would change Georgia voting laws ahead of this year’s presidenti­al election. It could receive final votes in the Senate and House next week.

Other election-related bills would ban using computer QR codes to count ballots, allow local election officials to reduce the number of voting machines on election day, require more audits, post ballot pictures online, add watermarks to ballots and criminaliz­e the use of deepfake computer-generated media to deceive voters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States