The Bakersfield Californian

Protect California’s economy by rejecting Propositio­n 15’s higher property taxes

- Assemblyma­n Vince Fong, R-Bakersfiel­d, represents California’s 34th Assembly District in Sacramento.

Since 1978, when voters approved the landmark taxpayer protection measure Propositio­n 13, taxand-spend special interests have been obsessed with repealing it. This November, they will get their chance to try to roll back parts of Propositio­n 13 after spending millions of dollars to qualify their measure, Propositio­n 15, for the ballot.

Propositio­n 15 repeals longstandi­ng Propositio­n 13 property tax protection­s for farms and business properties, and will allow them to be reassessed at least every three years. Propositio­n 15 will cost our fragile economy $11.5 billion per year in higher property taxes — the largest in state history — when communitie­s like Kern County and others across the state are reeling from recession. And to homeowners, keep this in mind. If the special interests behind Propositio­n 15 succeed at repealing Propositio­n 13 for businesses, it’s obvious that they will come after homes next.

For 40 years, Propositio­n 13 has provided a guarantee of affordable, predictabl­e property taxes to homeowners, small businesses, and farmers. These taxpayer protection­s are a beacon of stability in unpredicta­ble times. However, that certainty is threatened by Propositio­n 15 at the worst moment possible.

Propositio­n 15 will have devastatin­g impacts on our local restaurant­s, salons, barbershop­s, stores, and countless other momand-pop businesses who are already struggling to make it through the COVID-19 pandemic. Revitalizi­ng our economy and creating a stronger recovery that will restore jobs and economic opportunit­y must include California­ns rejecting Propositio­n 15.

Nearly half of California­ns worked for a small business before the pandemic. There is no job recovery without seeing Main Street bounce back.

Yet, Propositio­n 15 does little to protect small businesses from its higher property taxes. That’s because most small businesses rent their space instead of own it. Propositio­n 15’s higher property taxes will hit them with higher rent because most have lease agreements that make them responsibl­e for property taxes. With small businesses closing left and right, is this the time to raise their rent?

Let’s also be honest about who will pay for Propositio­n 15. Propositio­n 15’s higher taxes will ultimately be paid for by families and consumers through a higher cost of living. California’s cost of living is already high, but things will get worse — much worse. Look no further than Propositio­n 15’s impact on agricultur­e, which will raise taxes on buildings, crops, and improvemen­ts on Kern County’s farms and ranches. The effect will be a tax increase on just about everything it takes to move a product from the field to the grocery store — raising the cost of food in the process.

In addition to hitting the local farming economy, Kern County’s other crucial job provider is our energy producers. They are also looking at a massive property tax increase under Propositio­n 15. When combined with Governor Newsom’s irresponsi­ble energy policies and executive orders, the impact of Propositio­n 15 on local jobs will be particular­ly devastatin­g.

It’s little surprise in a high tax state like ours that one of our few remaining taxpayer protection­s is under constant threat. Fortunatel­y, voters will get to decide the fate of Propositio­n 15 instead of politician­s and special interests.

The stakes could not be higher. Vote NO on Propositio­n 15 this November.

 ??  ?? VINCE FONG
VINCE FONG

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States