The Bakersfield Californian

Prop 16: It’s not a handout, it’s a hand up

- Arleana Waller is the ShePower global ambassador and founder of the MLKcommUNI­TY Initiative.

In 1996, the passage of Propositio­n 209 banned affirmativ­e action in California and began to roll back the progress of the Civil Rights Movement. The effect of Propositio­n 209 has been a full generation of lost educationa­l opportunit­y for diverse students in science, business, law, education and medicine. At the same time, minority- and women-owned businesses lose out on more than $1 billion each year from lost public contract opportunit­ies.

In November, we can reverse these losses by voting Yes on Propositio­n 16, which would allow state and local government­s to again use affirmativ­e action.

Last month, The California­n encouraged a “No” vote on Propositio­n 16, suggesting that there are “better ways to achieve educationa­l and economic diversity than affirmativ­e action.” The reality is that the education and economic achievemen­t gaps that we have seen have been a direct result of Propositio­n 209.

Contrary to what The California­n argues, affirmativ­e action is essential for promoting equal opportunit­y for women and minorities. In a world without affirmativ­e action, women and minorities receive less pay, get fewer chances to attend top colleges and have scarce job opportunit­ies.

With affirmativ­e action, we can level the playing field by allowing decisionma­kers to consider race and gender — without the use of quotas — when making decisions about public contracts, employment and college admissions,

California desperatel­y needs to change course. In the past 24 years, we have seen Black and Latino enrollment at California’s universiti­es remain flat as the population has increased.

However, Propositio­n 209 has hamstrung California in not being able to generate concerted action to roll back these inequities.

On the other hand, Propositio­n 16 would allow state and local government­s to identify racial and gender disparitie­s and develop programs to directly address discrimina­tion. This is not a handout, but a hand up.

The California­n calls for piecemeal solutions that aren’t enough to deal with the systemic problems that got us here.

The paper cited “innovative minority recruitmen­t strategies” as “a more effective way to increase diversity on university campuses, public workforces and in public contractin­g.”

But the clever initiative­s cited have only worked in one-off situations and are illequippe­d to reverse problems resulting from generation­s of deliberate choices.

To solve a statewide problem, California can’t rely on a random collection of programs to solve systemic issues.

Indeed, these same piecemeal approaches have led to underrepre­sented Latino population­s at seven of nine University of California campuses and Black underrepre­sentation at all nine.

This is a real problem.

The editorial neglects to mention that California is one of only nine states that bans affirmativ­e action.

And that ban has led to minority-owned businesses only receiving 57 percent of the contract dollars that they would if opportunit­ies were equal, and women receive only 29 percent.

Right now, nearly all public contracts in

California and the jobs that go with them are given to large companies run by older white men. Annually, economists believe that minority- and women-owned businesses lose out on over $1 billion in state contracts since Propositio­n 209.

In states that allow affirmativ­e action, women and minorities earn higher wages and can compete on equal footing for state contracts. It hurts California families when women must choose between having a child and keeping her job, when she’s passed up for promotions because of caretaking responsibi­lities or they aren’t paid equally to men.

With Propositio­n 16, we can start to knock down the barriers women face, so we can all have opportunit­ies to succeed.

We all do better when we all have equal opportunit­ies to succeed.

Some would have you believe that we

can only heal the ills of our past by creating a colorblind society.

After 24 years under Propositio­n 209, it is now clear that curing a lack of opportunit­y from color-based discrimina­tion is impossible without affirmativ­ely acting to help the disenfranc­hised. The wealthy and well-connected in California continue to control access to lucrative careers, top universiti­es, state contracts and other opportunit­ies for success, and they keep picking people just like them over well-qualified people from diverse background­s.

With Propositio­n 16, we can start to knock down the barriers for women and minorities, so we all can have opportunit­ies to succeed.

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I / AP ?? State Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, center, raises his fist in celebratio­n as the Senate approves a measure to place a proposed Constituti­onal amendment on the November ballot to overturn its ban on affirmativ­e action at the Capitol in Sacramento Wednesday.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I / AP State Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, center, raises his fist in celebratio­n as the Senate approves a measure to place a proposed Constituti­onal amendment on the November ballot to overturn its ban on affirmativ­e action at the Capitol in Sacramento Wednesday.
 ??  ?? ARLEANA WALLER
ARLEANA WALLER

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States