The Bakersfield Californian

REACTION TO COMMITTEE VOTE

-

The following quotes are excerpts from statements issued after Tuesday’s defeat of Senate Bill 467, which would phase out several common oilfield techniques and create a 2,500-foot buffer around oil and gas sites.

“A common theme in all of the communitie­s we work in is that politician­s would never make the decisions that they make if they lived in the same conditions as frontline communitie­s. They wouldn’t put oil and gas this close to schools the way they are in Shafter. They wouldn’t put an oil pump in their own backyard like in Arvin.” — Cesar Aguirre, community organizer with the Central California Environmen­tal Justice Network

“Lawmakers understood how this unconstitu­tional bill could expose the state to billions in lawsuits, would hurt the state’s climate leadership, and eliminate more than 50,000 quality careers in parts of the state that are struggling in this post-pandemic economy. We will continue to oppose bills that only increase our reliance on foreign oil which drives up gas prices, contribute­s to pollution in our crowded ports, and is produced without California’s environmen­tal protection­s or humanitari­an values.” — Rock Zierman, CEO of the California Independen­t Petroleum Associatio­n trade group

“California can no longer call itself a climate or racial justice leader while continuing to perpetuate environmen­tal racism that has long oppressed generation­s of Black, Indigenous, and Latinx communitie­s along with other communitie­s of color and low-income communitie­s.” — Juan Flores, community organizer with the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environmen­t, one of the SB 467’s co-sponsors

“Yet again, elected politician­s have revealed their prioritiza­tion of fossil fuel talking points and interests over the people they are supposed to represent. Now, more and more California­ns are waking up to the realities of environmen­tal injustice and their state’s legacy of environmen­tal racism, which impacts low-income and Black, Latinx, and Indigenous communitie­s more than any other.” — Kobi Naseck, Coalition Coordinato­r, Voices in Solidarity Against Oil in Neighborho­ods (VISIÓN), another of the bill’s co-sponsors

“Blanket bans are rarely good public policy, and SB 467 would have eliminated thousands of jobs, devastated regional economies and hurt workers and families throughout the state. There are better ways to balance the environmen­t, energy, equity and the economy, and our people, ideas and experience are critical to developing those solutions.” — Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Associatio­n trade group

“The notion that California has the safest oil operations flies in the face of the everyday realities of communitie­s across the (Central) Valley, who are sheltering in place next to toxic sources like oil wells, refineries, and leaky pipelines that harm their health and quality of life. Every delay is justice denied for some of the most polluted communitie­s of color and low income communitie­s in our region. We will continue to hold decision makers at all levels accountabl­e for the lack of health protection­s and the urgent need for a just transition plan for workers and communitie­s.” — Catherine Garoupa White, executive director of the Central Valley Air Quality Coalition

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States