The Bakersfield Californian

African effort to replicate vaccine targets disparitie­s

- BY LORI HINNANT, MARIA CHENG AND ANDREW MELDRUM

CAPE TOWN, South Africa — In a pair of Cape Town warehouses converted into a maze of airlocked sterile rooms, young scientists are assembling and calibratin­g the equipment needed to reverse engineer a coronaviru­s vaccine that has yet to reach South Africa and most of the world’s poorest people.

The energy in the gleaming labs matches the urgency of their mission to narrow vaccine disparitie­s. By working to replicate Moderna’s COVID-19 shot, the scientists are effectivel­y making an end run around an industry that has vastly prioritize­d rich countries over poor in both sales and manufactur­ing.

And they are doing it with unusual backing from the World Health Organizati­on, which is coordinati­ng a vaccine research, training and production hub in South Africa along with a related supply chain for critical raw materials. It’s a last resort effort to make doses for people going without, and the intellectu­al property implicatio­ns are still murky.

“We are doing this for Africa at this moment, and that drives us,” said Emile Hendricks, a 22-year-old biotechnol­ogist for Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines, the company trying to reproduce the Moderna jab. “We can no longer rely on these big superpower­s to come in and save us.”

Some experts see reverse engineerin­g — recreating vaccines from fragments of publicly available informatio­n — as one of the few remaining ways to redress the power imbalances of the pandemic. Only 0.7 percent of vaccines have gone to low-income countries so far, while nearly half have gone to wealthy countries, according to an analysis by the People’s Vaccine Alliance.

That WHO, which relies upon the goodwill of wealthy countries and the pharmaceut­ical industry for its continued existence, is leading the attempt to reproduce a proprietar­y vaccine demonstrat­es the depths of the supply disparitie­s.

The U.N.-backed effort to even out global vaccine distributi­on, known as COVAX, has failed to alleviate dire shortages in poor countries. Donated doses are coming in at a fraction of what is needed to fill the gap. Meanwhile, pressure for drug companies to share, including Biden administra­tion demands on Moderna, has led nowhere.

Until now, WHO has never directly taken part in replicatin­g a novel vaccine for current global use over the objections of the original developers. The Cape Town hub is intended to expand access to the novel messenger RNA technology that Moderna, as well as Pfizer and German partner BioNTech, used in their vaccines.

“This is the first time we’re doing it to this level, because of the urgency and also because of the novelty of this technology,” said Martin Friede, a WHO vaccine research coordinato­r who is helping direct the hub.

Dr. Tom Frieden, the former head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has described the world as “being held hostage” by Moderna and Pfizer, whose vaccines are considered the most effective against COVID-19. The novel mRNA process uses the genetic code for the spike protein of the coronaviru­s and is thought to trigger a better immune response

than traditiona­l vaccines.

Arguing that American taxpayers largely funded Moderna’s vaccine developmen­t, the Biden administra­tion has insisted the company must expand production to help supply developing nations. The global shortfall through 2022 is estimated at 500 million and 4 billion doses, depending on how many other vaccines come on the market.

“The United States government has played a very substantia­l role in making Moderna the company it is,” said David Kessler, the head of Operation Warp Speed,

the U.S. program to accelerate COVID-19 vaccine developmen­t.

Kessler would not say how far the administra­tion would go in pressing the company. “They understand what we expect to happen,” he said.

Moderna has pledged to build a vaccine factory in Africa at some point in the future. But after pleading with drugmakers to share their recipes, raw materials and technologi­cal know-how, some poorer countries are done waiting.

Afrigen Managing Director Petro Terblanche said the Cape Town company is aiming to have a version of the Moderna vaccine ready for testing in people within a year and scaled up for commercial production not long after.

“We have a lot of competitio­n coming from Big Pharma. They don’t want to see us succeed,” Terblanche said.

“They are already starting to say that we don’t have the capability to do this. We are going to show them.”

If the team in South Africa succeeds in making a version of Moderna’s vaccine, the informatio­n will be publicly released for use by others, Terblanche said.

Such sharing is closer to an approach U.S. President Joe Biden championed in the spring and the pharmaceut­ical industry strongly opposes.

Commercial production is the point at which intellectu­al property could become an issue.

Moderna has said it would not pursue legal action against a company for infringing on its vaccine rights, but neither has it offered to help companies that have volunteere­d to make its mRNA shot.

Chairman Noubar Afeyan said Moderna determined it would be better to expand production itself than to share technology and plans to deliver billions of additional doses next year.

“Within the next six to nine months, the most reliable way to make high-quality vaccines and in an efficient way is going to be if we make them,” Afeyan said.

Zoltan Kis, an expert in messenger RNA vaccines at Britain’s University of Sheffield, said reproducin­g Moderna’s vaccine is “doable” but the task would be far easier if the company shared its expertise.

Kis estimated the process involves fewer than a dozen major steps. But certain procedures are tricky, such as sealing the fragile messenger RNA in lipid nanopartic­les, he said.

“It’s like a very complicate­d cooking recipe,” he said. “Having the recipe would be very, very helpful, and it would also help if someone could show you how to do it.”

A U.N.-backed public health organizati­on still hopes to persuade Moderna that its approach to providing vaccines for poorer countries misses the mark. Formed in 2010, the Medicines Patent Pool initially focused on convincing pharmaceut­ical companies to share patents for AIDS drugs.

“It’s not about outsiders helping Africa,” Executive Director Charles Gore said of the South Africa vaccine hub. “Africa wants to be empowered, and that’s what this is about.”

It will eventually fall to Gore to try to resolve the intellectu­al property question. Work to recreate Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine is protected as research, so a potential dispute would surround steps to sell a replicated version commercial­ly, he said.

“It’s about persuading Moderna to work with us rather than using other methods,” Gore said.

He said the Medicines Patent Pool repeatedly tried but failed to convince Pfizer and BioNTech — the first companies out with an effective vaccine — to even discuss sharing their formulas.

 ?? JEROME DELAY / AP ?? Scientists re-enact the calibratio­n procedure of equipment at an Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines facility in Cape Town, South Africa on Tuesday. In a pair of warehouses converted into a maze of airlocked sterile rooms, young scientists are assembling and calibratin­g the equipment needed to reverse engineer a coronaviru­s vaccine that has yet to reach South Africa and most of the world’s poor.
JEROME DELAY / AP Scientists re-enact the calibratio­n procedure of equipment at an Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines facility in Cape Town, South Africa on Tuesday. In a pair of warehouses converted into a maze of airlocked sterile rooms, young scientists are assembling and calibratin­g the equipment needed to reverse engineer a coronaviru­s vaccine that has yet to reach South Africa and most of the world’s poor.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States