The Bakersfield Californian

Supervisor­s vote to look at 1-cent sales tax increase for unincorpor­ated areas of Kern

- BY JOHN COX jcox@bakersfiel­d.com

Kern’s Board of Supervisor­s began the process Tuesday of possibly putting a 1-cent sales tax increase on the November ballot that would apply only to the county’s unincorpor­ated areas and be overseen by a citizen’s committee.

Nearly four years after county voters soundly rejected a similar measure, the board voted 4-0, with Supervisor Mike Maggard absent, to have staff return Tuesday with a ballot proposal that would require approval by a simple majority of voters in unincorpor­ated Kern.

Supervisor Leticia Perez made a motion to request the proposal after a series of county officials and others spoke of the need for “self-determinat­ion” to stabilize Kern’s general fund and improve local public services. That followed a staff presentati­on showing the county’s tax revenues have declined steadily since 2014.

Other members of the board hesitated to second the motion, having expressed reservatio­ns with the idea of raising local taxes, especially at a time of soaring inflation. But then Supervisor Phillip Peters seconded Perez’s motion and it won approval.

There was little indication on Tuesday’s meeting agenda that the board was going to take up a tax increase. Instead, there was an item labeled as a “presentati­on on community engagement efforts, identified needs and public service prioritiza­tion.”

When that agenda item came up, county staff led by Chief Administra­tive Officer Ryan Alsop took the board through the results of public surveys last year and this year regarding what residents would like to see in terms of public services.

The top priorities that surfaced were public safety; mental health and addiction services for people who are homeless; roadwork; emergency medical response; and prevention of property

crimes. It was noted that residents of the county’s unincorpor­ated areas lack the breadth and depth of services available to people living in cities.

Next, staff showed that the county’s discretion­ary income has fallen since 2014, when a drop in global oil prices led to a sharp decline in Kern property tax revenues. The point was made that the oil industry’s prospects have continued to decline as the Newsom administra­tion has targeted in-state oil production, while a statewide property tax exemption on utility-scale solar installati­ons has deprived Kern of an estimated $20 million per year in revenue.

The bottom line was that county government’s discretion­ary revenue has stagnated during the past seven years, slipping 6 percent to hit about $392 million. That figure represents about 12 percent of Kern’s total budget.

Staff noted that 34 of California’s 58 counties charge more than the state’s 7.25 percent sales tax, and that some of those that don’t, like Ventura County, generally don’t need to levy a higher tax because they already bring in enough money to support ample public services.

Alsop laid much of the blame with Sacramento, saying the state continues to push unfunded mandates that cost Kern up to $500 million per year, and that the oil and gas industry is being “regulated into extinction” with slow permitting and bans on certain oil field techniques common locally.

He said the sales tax proposal would create an advisory committee to “assist with full transparen­cy” on how the new revenues would be spent.

Among the officials who spoke in support of raising more tax money locally was county District Attorney Cynthia Zimmer, who said it’s imperative that Kern have money available to recruit and retain specialize­d staff.

Dave Nelson, president of the Kern County Firefighte­rs Associatio­n, said his group is generally against raising taxes but that it can support the 1-cent sales tax proposal.

“We need to do something to address those (public services) issues,” he said. “We’re under the strangleho­ld of legislatio­n that’s not going to go away.”

Kern’s director of planning and natural resources, Lorelei Oviatt, said the county needs to stabilize its general fund because investors who would otherwise put money into developing projects locally won’t do so “when we have the kind of crime and the kind of challenges” being experience­d now in the county’s unincorpor­ated areas.

“I support this idea of self-determinat­ion,” she told the board.

Peters initially resisted endorsing the idea of a sales tax increase, saying he had more questions than answers for staff. He said it was important to show voters what the county has done to address its needs short of raising more money from taxpayers.

But, he said, “I definitely understand the need, and I definitely want to do whatever we can to help support our public safety and our county.”

Supervisor David Couch said he had similar concerns but that he agreed public safety is the main priority.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States