The Boston Globe

Boston, state must act on home heating changes

- By Joan Fitzgerald Joan Fitzgerald is a professor of public policy and urban affairs at Northeaste­rn University and the author of “Greenovati­on: Urban Leadership on Climate Change.”

Reaching the goals of the Massachuse­tts clean energy and climate bill passed this summer and Boston’s Carbon Free Boston plan will require a massive shift from heating our homes with gas and oil to electric heat pumps that do both heating and cooling.

A heat pump takes heat from outside and moves it into your home in the winter and takes heat from inside in hot weather and moves it outside.

Unlike furnaces, heat pumps themselves don’t generate carbon dioxide, though a utility’s method of producing the electricit­y used to power them (and other household devices) may well involve burning fossil fuels. However, since heat pumps are extremely efficient, they are considered an important step in the overall reduction of greenhouse gases.

But we aren’t installing enough of them. We need to transition an additional halfmillio­n Massachuse­tts homes to heat pumps by 2030 to meet the state’s climate targets. In a recently published Boston Foundation report that assesses Boston’s climate action, decarboniz­ation researcher Michael Walsh and I found that both Boston and Massachuse­tts are considerab­ly behind on their heat pump installati­on goals. And for the most part, the heat pumps installed did not completely eliminate fossil fuels in the home because people used gas or oil for other purposes such as hot water or cooking.

Mass Save, a utility energy-efficiency initiative, offers rebates for adopting heat pumps. And the Inflation Reduction Act will provide $9 billion toward home energy-efficiency rebates as well.

So why is adoption so slow?

For starters, town regulation­s are often confusing and difficult to navigate. Further, many local contractor­s are not comfortabl­e designing a home-heating system that relies primarily on heat pumps. Meanwhile, we aren’t training enough contractor­s in this field.

My own experience reveals how these problems play out. My husband and I decided to replace an antiquated air conditione­r and baseboard electric heat on one floor with a heat pump. I started going down the list of qualified providers assembled by Mass Save. Of the seven I called or e-mailed, only two replied.

After a home visit to evaluate our needs, the first gave us a shocking $19,000 estimate (keep in mind this was only for one floor). I asked why the estimate was so high when the equipment itself only cost $4,000. No response. After repeated attempts to follow-up, I received a voice mail telling me that the company owner had determined he would need a crane to get the unit on the roof, so the cost would be “3 to 4 times more than the proposal.” My conclusion: For whatever reason, he didn’t want to install the system.

I finally found a second contractor to provide an estimate. Based on our phone call, he recommende­d a totally different system than the first contractor. But he didn’t show up at the scheduled time for a more precise review. We reschedule­d — same thing.

After four months of searching, I found a company that will install the system for $12,000. But because the ideal unit had been on back order for months, we had to opt for an alternativ­e. That highlights another problem: Currently, there is almost no manufactur­ing of heat pumps in the United States.

Further, the permitting process is often time consuming for contractor­s, as each city

All levels of government need to get serious about removing obstacles.

and town has its own requiremen­ts. Cambridge, for example, has noise ordinances for the condensing units, which are not limited to the equipment itself. If the surroundin­g structures amplify the sound above the legal level, the contractor is responsibl­e for rectifying it.

With all the estimates and communicat­ions that go into correctly designing a system that works for a specific home, the various city permitting requiremen­ts, Mass

Save’s rebate rules, and the difficulty of obtaining the agreed-upon equipment, it’s no wonder so many contractor­s choose not to install heat pumps.

Add to these problems a shortage of workers with the necessary installati­on expertise. The Department of Energy is exploring additional investment in workforce developmen­t for heat pump manufactur­ing and installati­on. Closer to home, the Massachuse­tts Clean Energy Center is investing in training programs to bring underrepre­sented population­s into the clean energy trades, including heat pump installati­on.

These investment­s will help, but at the state and local level, we need to build more green technology career-ladder programs in our high schools, community colleges, and universiti­es to develop the workforce.

Finally, we need to rethink the rebates. I will have to pay upfront for my $12,000 system to get the $2,500 rebate from Mass Save. That would be prohibitiv­e for many people. There, the increased federal rebates will help somewhat.

Heat pump technology is essential to meeting state and city carbon-reduction goals and for lowering consumer costs.

But all levels of government need to get serious about removing obstacles.

 ?? ELIAS WILLIAMS/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? An electrical worker installed wiring for heat pumps in a 100-year-old brownstone in Brooklyn, N.Y., on March 22.
ELIAS WILLIAMS/THE NEW YORK TIMES An electrical worker installed wiring for heat pumps in a 100-year-old brownstone in Brooklyn, N.Y., on March 22.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States