The Boston Globe

By passing defense bill, Senate sets up clash with House

- By Karoun Demirjian

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday gave overwhelmi­ng approval to the annual defense policy bill, sidesteppi­ng a contentiou­s debate over abortion access for service members and quashing efforts to limit aid for Ukraine in a show of bipartisan­ship that set up a bitter showdown with the House.

The vote was 86 to 11 to pass the bill, which would authorize $886 billion for national defense over the next year. It includes a 5.2 percent pay raise for troops and civilian employees, investment­s in hypersonic missile and drone technology, and measures to improve competitio­n with China.

But its fate is deeply in doubt as the measure heads for what is expected to be a contentiou­s negotiatio­n between the Democratic-led Senate and the Republican-led House, where rightwing hardliners have attached a raft of conservati­ve social policy mandates.

Republican­s in the Senate decided not to pick such fights in that chamber, shelving amendments to restrict abortion access and transgende­r health care services for military personnel. The result is vastly different bills that could make it difficult for the House and Senate to hash out a bipartisan final agreement, something that has not eluded Congress in more than six decades.

“What’s happening in the Senate is a stark contrast to the partisan race to the bottom we saw in the House, where House Republican­s are pushing partisan legislatio­n that has zero chance of passing,” Senator Chuck Schumer, the majority leader, of New York said on the floor Thursday. “We are passing important bipartisan legislatio­n; they are throwing on the floor partisan legislatio­n that has no chance of passing.”

House Republican leaders capitulate­d to pressure from rightwing lawmakers to load up the legislatio­n with partisan provisions, prompting all but four Democrats to oppose it. That measure would shut the Pentagon’s diversity training offices, end military health coverage for gender transition treatments, and block the Pentagon from offering time off and travel reimbursem­ent to service members needing to travel out of state to obtain an abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court striking down Roe v. Wade.

Democrats have made clear that they would never support those measures. On Thursday, party leaders in the Senate predicted they would be able to protect the Pentagon’s abortion access policy during negotiatio­ns with the House.

“We’re going into conference with the position that the Senate basically has concluded that the policy of the Department of Defense is both legal and one that should be retained,” said Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, the chair of the Armed Services Committee. “We’re going to stick to that position, and I think we will prevail.”

The Senate’s bill is silent on the matter of abortion and transgende­r services. But it nods to Republican­s’ frequent complaints that the Pentagon has been overtaken by liberal policies run amok; it would ban the Pentagon from requiring that people list their pronouns on official correspond­ence, and impose salary caps and a hiring freeze on positions dedicated solely to promoting equity and inclusion.

The Biden administra­tion warned in a statement about the Senate bill Thursday that those provisions would undermine efforts to promote a diverse workforce. The White House has said that President Biden would veto the House bill.

The chief Republican objection to the Senate measure was that it was not large enough.

“Ideally we would have an annual 3 to 5 percent boost above inflation to our top line,” Senator Roger Wicker of Mississipp­i, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee, said on the floor Thursday night. “Even without that budget increase our committee has advanced a strong bipartisan product that contains numerous, important provisions.”

Wicker blocked an effort to include language approving the transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia, in a bid to pressure the Biden administra­tion to put more money toward submarine production in the United States. The bill facilitate­s other parts of a security pact between the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, which the Pentagon sees as key to checking Chinese dominance in the Indo-Pacific.

His complaint was echoed by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the top Republican on the Appropriat­ions Committee, and Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader.

“President Biden’s defense request grossly underestim­ates what’s required to meet the challenges his own national defense strategy identifies,” McConnell said Thursday. “If we’re serious about deterring conflict in the Indo-Pacific, we must address America’s aging attack submarine fleet.”

Bitter bipartisan showdown over policy priorities

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States