The Boston Globe

Biden administra­tion proposes requiring lead pipes replaced

EPA rule would affect 9m pipes across country

- By Coral Davenport

The Biden administra­tion is proposing new restrictio­ns that would require the removal of virtually all lead water pipes across the country in an effort to prevent another public health catastroph­e like the one that came to define Flint, Mich.

The proposal Thursday from the Environmen­tal Protection Agency would impose the strictest limits on lead in drinking water since federal standards were first set 30 years ago. It would affect about 9 million pipes that snake throughout communitie­s across the country.

“This is the strongest lead rule that the nation has ever seen,” Radhika Fox, the EPA’s assistant administra­tor for water, said in an interview. “This is historic progress.”

Digging up and replacing lead pipes from coast to coast is no small undertakin­g. The EPA estimates the price at $20 billion to $30 billion over the course of a decade. The rule would require utilities — and most likely their ratepayers — to absorb most of that cost, but $15 billion is available from the 2021 infrastruc­ture law to help pay for it.

Tom Dobbins, the chief executive of the Associatio­n of Metropolit­an Water Agencies, said his members would need both technical help and more financial assistance from the federal government to comply with the proposed regulation­s. He urged the EPA to “focus on providing drinking water systems with the resources and tools necessary to achieve this ambitious goal, and working toward eliminatin­g the real barriers that exist for many utilities.”

In a statement, the associatio­n said it had repeatedly called attention to a long list of obstacles that make it difficult to replace lead pipes, including rising costs, supply chain problems, labor shortages, and incomplete or missing building records.

Lead is a neurotoxin that can cause irreversib­le damage to the nervous system and the brain. It poses a particular danger to infants and children and can impair their cognitive developmen­t, cause behavioral disorders, and lead to lower IQs. From the nation’s earliest days, lead was used to make pipes to carry water to homes and businesses. But when plumbing corrodes, lead can leach into drinking water.

The problem drew national attention in 2014 in Flint, when a change in the water source and inadequate treatment and testing caused significan­t lead contaminat­ion. Lead and Legionella bacteria leached into the tap water of about 100,000 residents between 2014 and 2015.

Lead levels in drinking water also soared in 2019 in Newark, N.J., where Yvette Jordan is a high school teacher. “Forty percent of our students are special needs,” she said. “All of these effects we see in our classroom every single day.”

The EPA estimates that its proposal would generate $9.8 billion to $34.8 billion in economic benefits each year, in the form of less cognitive impairment and fewer health disorders, especially in children.

The proposal would not eliminate the amount of lead permitted in drinking water. Instead, the Biden administra­tion wants to lower the allowable amount to 10 parts per billion from the current 15 parts per billion.

That’s disappoint­ing to many advocates, who have called for a standard between zero and five parts per billion. Scientists agree there is no safe level of lead in drinking water.

“We have failed generation­s of children by not eliminatin­g lead,” said Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha, the Michigan pediatrici­an whose research helped to expose the 2014 Flint water crisis. “When you have a poison that has no safe levels at all in our drinking water, it makes it impossible to make sure that the future of our nation is successful.”

 ?? SETH WENIG/ASSOCIATED PRESS/FILE ?? Workmen prepared to replace older water pipes with new copper ones in Newark, N.J., in 2021.
SETH WENIG/ASSOCIATED PRESS/FILE Workmen prepared to replace older water pipes with new copper ones in Newark, N.J., in 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States