The Boston Globe

Americans are more vulnerable to foreign propaganda, senator says

Adversarie­s seen better at spread of disinforma­tion

- By Julian E. Barnes

WASHINGTON — The threat against elections by Russia and other foreign powers is far greater today than it was in 2020, the chair of the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee said Tuesday.

Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat who leads the committee, said the danger had grown for multiple reasons: Adversaria­l countries have become more adept at spreading disinforma­tion, Americans are more vulnerable to propaganda, communicat­ion between the government and social media companies has become more difficult, and artificial intelligen­ce is giving foreign powers new abilities.

The Intelligen­ce Committee was set to hold a hearing on election threats Wednesday, but it was postponed Tuesday to allow the Senate to consider the articles of impeachmen­t against Alejandro Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary. Warner said he hoped to reschedule the hearing quickly.

A bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, the final volume of which was released in 2020, chronicled extensive efforts by Russians to influence US politics in 2016.

Since then, Russia has only honed its ability to shape debates in Europe and the United States, while people everywhere have become more vulnerable, Warner said.

For a time, Americans and Europeans were becoming more aware of disinforma­tion or influence operations by Russia or other foreign powers. But today, conspiracy theories seem to be gaining more traction.

“With polarizati­on in this country, and the lack of faith in institutio­ns, people will believe anything or not believe things that come from what used to be viewed as trusted sources of informatio­n,” Warner said. “So there’s a much greater willingnes­s to accept conspiracy theories.”

Vulnerabil­ity to influence operations, Warner said, is not confined to the United States. In Slovakia, for example, Russian informatio­n operations influenced views of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

“Slovakia was 80 percent pro-Ukraine,” he said. “Two years later, with massive amounts of Russian misinforma­tion and disinforma­tion, you have a pro-Russian government and 55 percent of Slovaks think America started the war in Ukraine.”

After 2016, US intelligen­ce agencies intensifie­d their efforts to go after foreign government­s influencin­g the election.

During the 2018 midterm elections, US Cyber Command issued warnings to Russians conducting influence operations and shut down a troll farm trying to spread disinforma­tion.

In 2020, senior intelligen­ce officials repeatedly warned the public about Russian efforts to spread false stories about Joe Biden as he campaigned against President Trump.

But Warner said he believed some of the focus may have waned.

In 2018 and 2020, the National Security Agency, the FBI and US tech companies regularly shared informatio­n.

But court rulings in July and September put all coordinati­on between the US government and social media companies on hold for several months, blocking the sharing of threat informatio­n. Although the Supreme Court allowed the communicat­ions to resume in late October, the smooth informatio­n sharing that had taken place in previous elections was interrupte­d, Warner said.

Warner filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case arguing that voluntary informatio­n exchanges are necessary given the threat that malign foreign influence campaigns pose.

At the same time, artificial intelligen­ce tools have revolution­ized the kind of deceptive informatio­n that can be spread by foreign government­s.

Deepfake videos remain, for now, imperfect. And such manipulate­d imagery is often detected quickly.

Experts on artificial intelligen­ce say, however, that faked voice recordings are a more effective vehicle for disinforma­tion campaigns.

Warner said faked video could still influence the public, especially if an adversary mimicked a less-known local politician.

Artificial intelligen­ce, he said, is advancing very quickly, and it would be foolish to discount any aspect of the threat against elections. “Even in the last six months, the quality of the video produced by AI has improved so much,” Warner said.

Russia remains the largest threat to elections this year, according to intelligen­ce officials. Warner said that Moscow represente­d the varsity team of influence operations, but that it was wrong to disregard the capacity of China to conduct influence operations, even if it has not been as active as Russia.

“Our adversarie­s, China, Russia, Iran, and other nationstat­es, know that disinforma­tion works, and it’s remarkably cheap,” Warner said.

He said it was important that intelligen­ce officials convey a renewed sense of urgency about the threat of foreign influence.

 ?? KENT NISHIMURA/NEW YORK TIMES ?? Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said artificial intelligen­ce is also helping foreign powers.
KENT NISHIMURA/NEW YORK TIMES Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said artificial intelligen­ce is also helping foreign powers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States