USC cancels valedictorian’s speech
Groups criticize her support for Palestinians
The University of Southern California said it has canceled plans for a graduation speech by this year’s valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, who is Muslim. The school said the decision stemmed from security concerns based on emails and other electronic communications warning of a plan to disrupt the commencement, including at least one that targeted Tabassum.
“Over the past several days, discussion related to the selection of our valedictorian has taken on an alarming tenor,” said Andrew Guzman, the provost, who added that he had made the final decision to choose Tabassum. “The intensity of feelings, fueled by both social media and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, has grown to include many voices outside of USC and has escalated to the point of creating substantial risks relating to security and disruption at the commencement.”
But the university declined Tuesday to give details of where the communications were coming from or whether they were under criminal investigation. And its decision followed complaints about Tabassum’s selection by two campus pro-Israeli groups that cited her social media support for Palestinians.
Tabassum, a biomedical engineering major who identified herself as a first-generation American of South Asian descent, could not be reached for comment. But in a statement, she criticized the decision.
“I am both shocked by this decision and profoundly disappointed that the university is succumbing to a campaign of hate meant to silence my voice,” Tabassum wrote, adding, “There remain serious doubts about whether USC’s decision to revoke my invitation to speak is made solely on the basis of safety.”
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim civil rights organization, also condemned the decision to cancel the speech as “cowardly” and demanded that USC reverse it.
Graduation speeches could be the next point of contention for the free-speech debate, which has overwhelmed many universities since the Israel-Hamas war began. University officials have had to handle vociferous debates over pro-Palestinian student protests, which many Jewish students and alumni say often veer into antisemitism. Protesters say that the pushback is an attempt to censor their political beliefs.
But Guzman, while acknowledging that the decision to cancel the speech broke from university tradition, said, “To be clear: this decision has nothing to do with freedom of speech. There is no free-speech entitlement to speak at a commencement.”
Erroll Southers, who oversees security for USC, said in an interview that the decision followed a barrage of communications threatening the upcoming graduation ceremonies.
“No one could ever remember these kinds of grievances coming to us,” said Southers, associate senior vice president for safety and risk assurance. “They had identified our valedictorian. They were significant in terms of the specificity of the person, the event, meaning our commencement, and their intent to disrupt our commencement.”
Southers said it had not been decided whether Tabassum would be permitted to sit on the stage during the ceremonies.
USC announced April 5 that Tabassum, who is from Chino Hills, Calif., would be the 2024 valedictorian. She was selected from among more than 200 students who met the academic qualification — a grade-point average of at least 3.98. From that group, a selection committee of faculty members evaluated more than 100 applicants.
The announcement of Tabassum’s selection cited her volunteer work with nonprofit organizations in the Los Angeles area, including a mobile blood pressure clinic that visits homeless shelters and a group she cofounded that distributes medical supplies to areas in need around the world.
Shortly after the announcement, a campus group known as Trojans for Israel issued a statement saying that Tabassum “openly traffics antisemitic and anti-Zionist rhetoric.” It cited her social media bio, which included a link to a page that calls Zionism a “racist settler-colonial ideology.” A similar complaint came from the campus chapter of Chabad. The organizations urged the university to reconsider the selection of Tabassum.
Anuj Desai, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School, suggested that Tabassum could have legal grounds to sue, particularly in light of California law that supports students’ First Amendment rights.