The Capital

Schuh, friends hijacking plan in Crownsvill­e

- Guest Column Janet Holbrook Janet Holbrook of Crownsvill­e is on the faculty of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. She is a member of WISE, Women, Indivisibl­e, Strong, Effective.

Zoning is of critical importance to pretty much everyone. Where you live, the roads you drive on, where you go to the store — it defines our neighborho­ods and communitie­s.

You might not realize it, but we are in a whirlwind of zoning decisions right now. At a meeting at Baldwin Hall on Sept. 20, Phil Hager, county planning and zoning officer, described some of the whirlwind to about 100 Crownsvill­e residents.

The most important is the General Developmen­t Plan 2040, which will be completed in 2019 and is intended to be the plan for comprehens­ive re-zoning of the entire county. It will guide developmen­t and preservati­on efforts for the next decade, at least.

The current GDP was done in 2009 and incorporat­ed input from 14 Small Area Plans developed from 2000-2004. In contrast, the current process for 2040, as Hager explained it, is for the county, with the guidance of a Citizens Advisory Committee to come up with a plan for comprehens­ive re-zoning first.

Once the comprehens­ive rezoning is completed, Small Area Plans that seek local community input will be done.

Does anyone else see a problem with that plan? Shouldn’t the Small Area Plans be updated before the General Plan, especially since the Small Area Plans are more outdated than the GDP?

And perhaps more importantl­y, who is on the Citizens Advisory Committee? Disclaimer: I applied and was not selected.

The committee was appointed in August and there are representa­tives from “each of the seven County Council districts, as well as from the environmen­t, building, education, and planning sectors.”

County Executive Steve Schuh appointed Leo Wilson as the committee chair. Wilson is lead architect for the design of the Bayhawks Sports Complex proposal for rehab of the Crownsvill­e Hospital Center, his firm is Hammond Wilson Architects.

This is an obvious conflict of interest regarding a controvers­ial developmen­t proposal, a disqualify­ing one in our opinion. Exacerbati­ng this conflict is that Wilson, his company, Brendan Kelly (the Bayhawks’ owner) and his company (Smart Link LLC) donated more than $20,000 to Schuh’s campaign fund, according to Sept. 24 filings with the Maryland Campaign Reporting Informatio­n System.

Schuh doubled down on this conflict by appointing Michael Linynsky as the representa­tive from Crownsvill­e. Linysky is an advocate for the Bayhawks Sports Complex and received Bayhawks support for events he organized for Prince George’s County Fire Department.

Given the strong opposition to the stadium complex that Crownsvill­e residents have expressed at four public meetings, Linynsky is a poor choice to represent Crownsvill­e residents.

Oddly there were no representa­tives from Anne Arundel County Public Schools or county police or fire department­s. Nor did there seem to be anyone with specific expertise in transporta­tion.

We also found out recently that the Maryland State Department of Transporta­tion has agreed to do a study of a new interchang­e on Interstate 97 in Crownsvill­e because Schuh requested it in May. Is it a “coincidenc­e” that this is the very same study requested by the Maryland Secretary of Health Robert Neall in 2017 as part of a larger study to evaluate plans to build the Bayhawks Sports Complex?

So Schuh appears to be pushing that proposal forward on that front, too.

Why all the maneuverin­g to promote the Bayhawks’ proposal? Is there really a voice for local residents at the table or are we being duped and written out of the equation?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States