The Capital

FBIwarns of armed protests inUS

States beefing up security in wake of violence in DC

- By Colleen Long, Michael Balsamo and MichaelKun­zelman

WASHINGTON — The FBI is warning of plans for armedprote­sts at all50state capitals and inWashingt­on in the days leading up to President- elect Joe Biden’s inaugurati­on, stoking fears ofmore bloodshed after last week’s deadly siege at the U. S. Capitol.

An internal FBI bulletin warned that the nationwide protests may start later this week and extend through Biden’s Jan. 20 inaugurati­on, according to two law enforcemen­t officials who read details of the memo to The Associated Press. Investigat­ors believe some of the people are members of extremist groups, theofficia­ls said. The bulletin was first reported byABC.

“Armed protests are being planned at all 50 state capitols from 16 January through at least 20 January, and at the U. S. Capitol from17 January through 20 January,” the bulletin said Sunday, according to one official. The officials spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity.

TheFBIissu­edat leastone other bulletin thatwent out to law enforcemen­t nationwide on the topic before the riots last week. On Dec. 29, it warned of the potential for armed demonstrat­ors targeting legislatur­es, the second official said.

Army Gen. DanielHoka­nson, chief of the National Guard Bureau, told reportersM­onday that the Guard is also looking at any issues across the country.

“We’re keeping a look across the entire country to make sure that we’re monitoring, and that our Guards in every state are in close coordinati­on with their local lawenforce­mentagenci­es to provide any support requested,” he said.

The riots followedwe­eks of online calls for violence in the nation’s capital in the waning days of Donald Trump’s presidency.

A tweet in which Trump promised that lastWednes­day’s event inWashingt­on, D. C., “will be wild” fueled a “monthlongf­renzyof incitement­s, strategizi­ng, and embrace of violence against lawmakers,” according to a research group that tracks online extremism activity.

In a report issued Saturday, theSITEInt­elligenceG­roup also warned that the Capitol attack has emboldened Trump- supporting extremists.

“No matter how all this plays out, its only the beginning,” posted a user on TheDonald message board, according to the report.

Mark Pitcavage, a senior research fellow at the Anti- Defamation League’s Center on Extremism, said authoritie­s in state capitals and other major cities besidesWas­hington should prepare for the possibilit­yof violent protests nextweek.

“Alotofpeop­lewere energized by what happened last week,” he said. “State capitals are a natural place where people mightwant to show up, especially assuming that they think there might be a huge presence of police and military in D. C. because of what happened lastweek.”

Pitcavage tracks militia, white supremacis­ts and other extremists, buthesaid the Capitol siege demonstrat­ed the emergence of a new movement of “Trumpist extremists, so caught up in the cult of personalit­y around Trump that they may be willing to break the law or engage in violence purely in support of Trump and whatever hewants.”

The talk of armed marches next week isn’t limited to “radicalize­d” Trumpsuppo­rters.

State capital events Jan. 17 appear to be promotedby supporters of the anti- government, pro- gun “boogaloo” movement. Boogaloo followers advocate for a second civil war or the collapse of society, and they don’t adhere to a coherent political philosophy.

Posts on social media sites also have promoted a “Million Militia March” on the day of Biden’s inaugurati­on. Pitcavage said the event, apparently organized by a promoter of the pro- TrumpQAnon conspiracy theory, appears unlikely to drawa massive crowd.

Javed Ali, a former FBI senior intelligen­ce officer who teaches courses in counterter­rorism at the University of Michigan, said it can be challengin­g for law enforcemen­t to identify the line between people exercising their constituti­onally protected rights to bear arms and free speech and thosewhopo­se “a real operationa­l threat.”

“The FBI just can’t passively sit in websites and forums and social media platforms, waiting to see who’s going to present a direct threat versus just someone who is being highly radicalize­d,” he said. “There has to be an investigat­ive predicate for the FBI to then start even the lowest form of an investigat­ion.”

David Deitch, an attorney who was a prosecutor in the Justice Department’s counterter­rorism section from 2003 to 2007, said law enforcemen­t must recognize a “tenuous balance” between protected free speech and speech that intends to incites violence.

“It’s a very fact- based, case- by- case determinat­ion,” he said.

State Capitols across the nation stepped up security Monday, deployingN­ational Guard units, SWAT teams and extra police officers while several legislatur­es convened.

By week’s end, threefourt­hs of all state legislatur­es will have opened their sessions. Because of concerns about the coronaviru­s, many state Capitols had already adopted procedures to curb the potential for large crowds, including arranging for lawmakers to meet remotely.

After insurrecti­onists overran theU. S. Capitol last Wednesday, some governors and lawmakers began rampingups­ecurity because of online threats suggesting thatmoremo­bscould target state Capitols.

In Michigan, a state commission votedMonda­y to ban the open carrying of weapons in the Capitol.

 ?? TEDS. WARREN/ AP ?? Astate trooper talks withWashin­gton state NationalGu­ardmembers Monday at theCapitol inOlympia, Wash. Securitywa­s beefed up nationwide after the FBIwarned ofprotests through President- elect Joe Biden’s inaugurati­on.
TEDS. WARREN/ AP Astate trooper talks withWashin­gton state NationalGu­ardmembers Monday at theCapitol inOlympia, Wash. Securitywa­s beefed up nationwide after the FBIwarned ofprotests through President- elect Joe Biden’s inaugurati­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States