The Capital

Pittman’s homeowners­hip plan deserves a chance

Experts say meeting real-life challenges is best way for them to build self-efficacy

- By Sharon Holbrook

Anne Arundel County has a history of striking out on affordable housing action, at best making half-hearted attempts or, at worst, succumbing to torch-and-pitchfork sentiments about ruining property values.

House Bill 993, and its Senate companion SB0566, have the potential to change that. They would give the County Council power to use money generated by increased real estate transfer taxes to work on the problem. The proposal faces a crucial vote Monday by the five state senators representi­ng Anne Arundel.

We urge state Sens. Ed Reilly, Sarah Elfreth, Pam Beidle, Bryan Simonaire and Jim Rosapepe to put their votes behind this legislatio­n when they meet Monday. The goal has merit, the tax is carefully targeted to sales above $1 million and decisions on taxes are best made closest to those who are being taxed. In this case, that is the County Council.

County Executive Steuart Pittman is behind this proposal, a Democrat who believes in muscular government solutions to problems of inequity. It would give the council power to raise the transfer taxes, charged when real estate changes hands.

Past administra­tions and councils led by Republican­s have taken a laissez-faire approach to this issue, arguing that the median county housing price — between $300,000 and $400,000 depending on where you want to live and market conditions — is affordable enough to people who, well, can afford it.

And those who cannot, such as young teachers and police officers at the start of their career or families seeking to lift themselves out of poverty through the power of home equity, should just wait until their incomes rise or lucky happenstan­ce arrives.

The scorecard for this approach includes a few multi-family complexes here and there, but nowhere near enough to meet the demand. Change is needed.

Currently, the transfer tax is 1 percent, which combined with recordatio­n fees and state transfer taxes to add 2.2 percent to the price of a sale.

The county hopes raising the tax to 1.5% will build a kitty big enough to fund the rental assistance program Pittman created as a COVID-19 lifeline for many households during the pandemic, and, more to the point, leverage financing for developers who want to build homes that someone who makes less than the median county income can afford to buy.

It also could help the Annapolis housing authority, which clearly needs assistance in the redevelopm­ent of its properties and to improve its management.

Opponents offer two arguments. This will make housing less affordable by increasing the costs of a real estate sale and make the county less attractive to buyers and developers.

Poppycock.

This increase would add $5,000 to the cost of $1 million home in this county. Some counties have lower taxes and fees on real estate sales than Anne Arundel, some have higher. This will still be true if the legislatio­n passes.

People buy a home someplace for many reasons, and this county offers water access, good schools, parks and hospitals, a vibrant cultural center in Annapolis, train and air travel links, low property taxes — a recurring expense — good-paying local jobs and decent commutes to work in other jurisdicti­ons. The transfer tax is not a deciding factor.

County officials also point to this: Revenues from this tax increase would go back into the real estate economy, just not where business groups working to defeat it are making their money.

If the county’s senators vote in favor of this proposal, it likely will combine with last month’s vote of support from the House delegation to push it through the General Assembly. It still faces a potential veto from Gov. Larry Hogan, a conservati­ve and a developer from Annapolis who sees no tax and particular­ly no real estate tax as the solution to any problem.

Pittman deserves the chance to show he can create a program that would lower financial barriers to homeowners­hip in this county. State lawmakers should approve this bill.

I begged my 12-yearold to help me with the pandemic task of learning to dye my hair at home. I could have done it myself, but I’ve learned that small opportunit­ies to feel useful and successful are good for kids’ mental health, which I’m especially attuned to in our current circumstan­ces.

Among the other ideas I’ve tried during these long months: letting my kids practice phone skills by having them call to order takeout and asking them for help with setting up the Wi-Fi booster. In some cases, it would be faster to just do these things without their “help,” but I’m doing it deliberate­ly, to benefit my kids.

It might seem like a strange time to ask parents to take a new approach — don’t we have enough to juggle? But focusing on helping our kids develop what psychologi­sts call “self-efficacy,” or a person’s belief that they are capable of successful­ly meeting the tasks or challenges that face them, can yield immediate benefits.

But can such small tasks really instill a sense of control right now, in a pandemic? It’s possible, experts say, and allowing kids to try to meet reallife challenges is the best way for them to build that healthy self-efficacy.

Albert Bandura, the Stanford University psychologi­st who first developed the concept of self-efficacy in the 1970s, called these important first-person accomplish­ments “mastery experience­s.”

Lea Waters, professor of positive psychology at the University of Melbourne, Australia, said self-efficacy “is a primal part of the formula of good mental health, because without that sense of efficacy, without that belief that I can get things done, you can really easily see how a young person or even an adult would not only lose their confidence but lose their motivation to move forward.”

Humans thrive on a sense of control and capability; low self-efficacy, or learned helplessne­ss, is associated with anxiety, depression, lack of hope and lack of motivation, she said, while higher selfeffica­cy is associated with life satisfacti­on, self-confidence, social connection and growth mindset.

Mastery experience­s don’t have to be grand accomplish­ments. Waters pointed to things as small as kids completing “a Lego build that was a little bit hard,” packing their own backpacks or walking the dog by themselves.

She suggests that parents become detectives who notice a child’s successes and narrate them. This purposeful shift toward noticing and acknowledg­ing small wins helps parents take a positive approach while it also helps kids internaliz­e a sense of their growing abilities.

“We can spot those things and acknowledg­e, ‘You did that really well; you did that all by yourself,’ or ‘You didn’t need as much help from me this time around,’ ” she said.

These successes build up what she called a “bank account” of feelings of efficacy for children that they can draw on the next time they face a challenge, when parents can remind the child, “You know, last time you felt that way, and then you ended up being able to do it all by yourself.”

Of course, you don’t want to pile on more responsibi­lities than a child can handle. Parents should always be attentive to children’s health, ensuring that they don’t see signs of mental health issues that warrant profession­al support, said child and adolescent psychother­apist Katie Hurley, author of “The Happy Kid Handbook.”

“Every kid is different,” Hurley said. “Take a deep breath and say, ‘What is my kid like without a pandemic?’ ” Watch for concerning changes in sleep; eating significan­tly less or more; new anxious behaviors such as constant reassuranc­e-seeking or clinginess; a significan­t loss of focus; and less interest in connecting with friends, even in favorite ways like social media or video games, she said.

“Trust that when you feel that in your gut that something isn’t right, then it’s probably a good idea to get help.”

The impulse to “help” our kids by doing more for them is sometimes more about us than it is about our kids, said Ned Johnson, co-author of “The SelfDriven Child: The Science and Sense of Giving Your Kids More Control Over Their Lives.”

Research has shown that when parents jump in to help kids with a frustratin­g problem, that interventi­on can lower parent anxiety while leaving the child’s anxiety elevated, Johnson said. That’s because the anxious parent gains a sense of control from taking action rather than remaining helpless on the sidelines, but the child is still left feeling ineffectua­l and stressed.

It can be hard for parents to let children do more, and perhaps mess up, when a parent could do a task more quickly and effectivel­y.

But the pandemic has lowered the stakes in some common family situations. For example, when kids are doing remote learning and don’t have to catch the bus, they can take on responsibi­lity for waking themselves up.

If the child oversleeps, the parents aren’t stuck playing chauffeur; only the child will experience the natural consequenc­es of lateness, Johnson said, making it easier for parents to let go of some control.

With everyone spending more time at home, families can share tasks more readily, too, even if they’re not done perfectly. A preschoole­r with a broom may not necessaril­y be cleaning the floor well, but the child feels that efficacybu­ilding sense of accomplish­ment and helpfulnes­s when they are encouraged to try it for themselves, Johnson said, and “the experience of coping increases.”

If this all sounds like too much work in a pandemic, remember that parents who encourage their children’s strengths and selfeffica­cy not only help their kids but also themselves.

“Parents are really depleted,” Waters acknowledg­ed, but a positive, proactive approach is “kind of a win-win. It’s good for your kids,” and seeing children thrive is “good for us as parents as well,” she said.

And her research has found that using a strengths-building approach — finding areas where your kids can take on more responsibi­lity — is also correlated with an increase in parental selfeffica­cy, a sense that “you are doing the right thing as a parent.”

Courtney Ackerman, author of several positive psychology books, also counsels parents not to wait until the current crisis is over to instill more self-efficacy in children. Yes, working on developing resilience in these unpredicta­ble times may feel like shoveling while the snow is still falling, she said, but that’s OK.

“I think it’s always snowing,” she said. “It’s a specifical­ly difficult time now with the pandemic, but life is full of ups and downs.”

Now is an excellent time, perhaps better than any other, she said, to work on building a sense of self-efficacy in kids.

And if that means parents aren’t the only ones endlessly loading and unloading the dishwasher, so much the better.

 ?? JEFFREY F. BILL/CAPITAL GAZETTE ??
JEFFREY F. BILL/CAPITAL GAZETTE
 ?? JACK TAYLOR/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Guiding children toward mastery of new skills can help them thrive — and get some household chores done at the same time.
JACK TAYLOR/THE NEW YORK TIMES Guiding children toward mastery of new skills can help them thrive — and get some household chores done at the same time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States