The Capital

Congressio­nal Dems propose expanding Supreme Court

- By Carl Hulse

WASHINGTON — A group of House and Senate Democrats on Thursday introduced legislatio­n to expand the Supreme Court to 13 members from nine, working to build momentum for rebalancin­g the court after an aggressive Republican drive to move it to the right.

The bill, which would change the makeup of the court for the first time in 150 years, is unlikely to move forward even with Democrats in control of Congress — at least not before a new commission named last week by President Joe Biden completes a study exploring the subject. But its introducti­on opened a new front in the escalating partisan war over the judiciary, drawing outrage from Republican­s, who called it a power grab.

Democrats, who announced their plan on the steps of the Supreme Court, said the change was necessary to restore equilibriu­m on its bench after Senate Republican­s blocked President Barack Obama’s nominee in 2016 and pushed through three of President Donald Trump’s conservati­ve appointees, including one days before the election last year.

“Republican­s stole the court’s majority, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmati­on completing their crime spree,” Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., a sponsor of the legislatio­n, said in a statement announcing it.

“Senate Republican­s have politicize­d the Supreme Court, undermined its legitimacy and threatened the rights of millions of Americans, especially people of color, women and our immigrant communitie­s.”

But the legislatio­n has dim prospects in Congress, at least in the short term. With the filibuster in place, it stands no chance in the Senate, where it is hotly opposed by Republican­s who say that Democrats are trying to “pack” the court to gain partisan advantage. Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she had “no plans to bring it to the floor,” though she did not dismiss the possibilit­y of expanding the court at some point.

Pelosi said she preferred the approach taken by Biden, who ordered the new commission to study the issue and report within six months on potential changes to the court.

“The president’s taking the right approach to have a commission to study such a thing,” Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters. “It’s a big step. It’s not out of the question. It has been done before.”

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said that the president had not taken a position on the idea of enlarging the court and that he wanted to hear from the commission before reaching a conclusion.

Biden has been dismissive in the past about calls to expand the court. But it became a major issue in the Democratic presidenti­al primaries, and his promise to create a group to explore the idea was his way of avoiding taking a definitive stance. The commission is not expected to deliver a recommenda­tion on what to do but will instead gather informatio­n on the implicatio­ns of enlarging the court or imposing term limits on justices, who serve for life.

Republican­s immediatel­y assailed the idea, with Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, calling it an “insane” bill and noting that even liberal members of the court have opposed the idea.

“The public, by the way, agrees,” he said on the Senate floor. “They see through this discredite­d concept.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, called it a “terrible idea.”

“If successful, this would inevitably lead to changing the number of Supreme Court justices every time there is a shift in power,” he said.

But progressiv­e activists say they intend to press the legislatio­n despite resistance from both parties.

“We know this isn’t going to be an easy fight and that there’s work to do,” said Christophe­r Kang, the chief counsel for the advocacy group Demand Justice. “We’re prepared to go neighbor to neighbor, friend to friend, member to member, senator to senator, until we gain a majority of support in both the House and the Senate to pass this legislatio­n.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States