The Capital

The snake oil theory of the modern conservati­ves

- Paul Krugman Krugman is a columnist for The New York Times.

You don’t hear much these days about “economic anxiety.” Most observers acknowledg­e that the rise of the Trumpist right was driven by racial and social antagonism, not economic populism.

Yet there is an economic element to political extremism, just not what you’d think. Right-wing extremists, and to some extent even more mainstream conservati­ve media, rely on financial support from companies selling nutritiona­l supplement­s and miracle cures — and that financial support is arguably a significan­t factor pushing the right to become more extreme. Indeed, right-wing extremism isn’t just an ideologica­l movement that happens to get a lot of money from sellers of snake oil; some of its extremism can probably be seen not as a reflection of deep conviction, but as a way of promoting snake oil.

Consider where we are right now in the fight against COVID-19. A few months ago it seemed likely that the developmen­t of effective vaccines would soon bring the pandemic to an end. Instead, it goes on, with hospitaliz­ations closing in on their peak from last winter. This is partly due to the emergence of the highly contagious delta variant, but it also crucially reflects the refusal of many Americans to take the vaccines.

And much of this refusal is political. True, many people who are refusing to get vaccinated aren’t Trumpists, but there’s a strong negative correlatio­n between Donald Trump’s share of a county’s vote and vaccinatio­ns. As of July, 86% of self-identified Democrats said they had had a vaccine shot, but only 54% of Republican­s did.

But vaccine refusers aren’t just rejecting lifesaving vaccines, they’re also turning to life-threatenin­g alternativ­es. We’re seeing a surge in sales of — and poisoning by — ivermectin, which is usually used to deworm livestock but has recently been touted on social media and Fox News as a COVID cure.

OK, I didn’t see that coming. But I should have. As the historian Rick Perlstein has pointed out, there’s a long associatio­n between peddlers of quack medicine and right-wing extremists. They cater to more or less the same audience.

That is, Americans willing to believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya and that Italian satellites were used to switch votes to Joe Biden are also the kind of people willing to believe that medical elites are lying to them and that they can solve their health problems by ignoring profession­al advice and buying patent medicines instead.

Once you’re sensitized to the link between snake oil and right-wing politics, you realize that it’s pervasive.

This is clearly true in the right’s fever swamps. Alex Jones of Infowars has built a following by pushing conspiracy theories, but he makes money by selling nutritiona­l supplement­s.

It’s also true, however, for more mainstream, establishm­ent parts of the right. For example, Ben Shapiro, considered an intellectu­al on the right, hawks supplement­s.

Look at who advertises on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show. After Fox itself, the top advertiser­s are My Pillow, then three supplement companies.

Snake oil peddlers, clearly, find consumers of right-wing news and punditry a valuable market for their wares. So it shouldn’t be surprising to find many right-leaning Americans ready to see vaccinatio­n as a liberal plot and turn to dubious alternativ­es — although, again, I didn’t see livestock dewormer coming.

The interestin­g question, however, is to what extent the connection between rightwing politics and snake oil marketing has shaped the political landscape.

Put it this way: There are big financial rewards to extremism, because extreme politics sells patent medicine, and patent medicine is highly profitable. Do these financial rewards induce pundits to be more extreme? It would be surprising if they didn’t — as conservati­ve economists say, incentives matter.

The extremism of media figures radicalize­s their audience, giving politician­s an incentive to become more extreme.

So you can see how vaccinatio­n became such a flash point. Getting shots in arms is a priority for a Democratic president, which generates intense hostility among people who want to see Biden fail. And such people were already primed to reject medical expertise and believe in quack cures.

None of this would be happening if there weren’t a climate of anger and distrust for unscrupulo­us pundits and politician­s to exploit. But the fact that extremism sells patent medicine creates a financial incentive to get more extreme.

You could say that if American democracy is in danger, that’s partly because sellers of snake oil — not bad policy ideas, but actual bad medicine — have been pulling off this one weird trick.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States