The Capital

US knew truth about Afghanista­n. It didn’t listen.

- By Ruth Pollard Bloomberg Opinion Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Global leaders have spent these last critical weeks asking themselves: “What went wrong in Afghanista­n?” They’d be better off asking: “What did we do wrong in Afghanista­n?”

To get a sense of how badly the foreign interventi­on went off-course, you could do worse than to scroll through the Twitter feed of the Special Inspector General for Afghanista­n Reconstruc­tion, known as Sigar. This group, created by Congress, oversaw the nearly $145 billion the U.S. has spent on reconstruc­tion programs in the country.

In the hours leading up to the Aug. 31 deadline for the U.S. troop withdrawal, Sigar dropped some truth bombs. Like this: “U.S. prioritize­d tangible projects on which money could be spent and success claimed more quickly, over less tangible types of programmin­g with potential to be more enduring, such as capacity building. This trend would last more than a decade.”

And this: “Rather than reform and improve, Afghan institutio­ns and powerbroke­rs found ways to co-opt U.S. funds for their own purposes, which only worsened problems U.S. programs meant to address.” When the U.S. government “refused opportunit­ies to reconcile with defeated Taliban and declined to implement an inclusive, post-conflict peace process, the Taliban soon rebuilt itself as a powerful insurgency.”

You get the picture. The fact that this official oversight group is now tweeting publicly what it’s clearly been telling U.S. officials for years reflects the deep frustratio­n at the failure of successive administra­tions to heed its warnings. Call it hubris, call it American imperialis­m at its worst, the mission’s implosion was the ultimate outcome. And the only winner? The U.S. military-industrial complex.

It’s all there in Sigar’s “Lessons From Twenty years of Afghanista­n Reconstruc­tion” report released last month — the 11th since it took on the role 13 years ago. “Implementi­ng these critical lessons will save lives and prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in Afghanista­n, and in future reconstruc­tion missions elsewhere around the world,” it notes.

As far back as 2010, Sigar was flagging concerns over the United States’ response to Afghan requests for assistance in fighting corruption. The standards that Afghanista­n’s

auditor general and his staff were expected to follow had been translated into Arabic, not into the local languages of Dari or Pashtu. It also noted issues with tracking weapons provided to the Afghan National Security Force. Things only worsened from there.

Sadly, it is all too late now. There was, of course, some progress. The U.S.-led mission oversaw improvemen­ts in health care, maternal health and education, but for the most part the troubled reconstruc­tion effort has been marked by “too many failures,” the report found. “Every agency experience­d annual lobotomies as staff constantly rotated out, leaving successors to start from scratch and make similar mistakes all over again.” And by spending money faster than could be accounted for, Washington’s actions fueled corruption, delegitimi­zed the Afghan government and increased insecurity.

A similar situation played out in Iraq. As Emma Sky noted in her 2015 book “The Unravellin­g: High Hopes and Missed Opportunit­ies in Iraq,” which documented the consequenc­es of U.S. efforts to impose its version of democracy on the Middle Eastern nation, the overthrow of an authoritar­ian regime can lead to state collapse and conflict. “There was more the U.S. could have done to help broker a deal among the elites and to ensure a peaceful transfer of power through elections,” Sky wrote. “The failure of this policy became all to apparent when the Islamic State catapulted to prominence in June 2014.”

Back in Kabul, banks are short on hard currency and the lines of those desperate for money are growing by the day. In a cash-driven economy like Afghanista­n, things are going to fall apart pretty quickly if people cannot buy food, fuel or medicine. That means a severe economic and humanitari­an crisis is brewing, while the U.S. and institutio­ns like the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund continue to block foreign currency and developmen­t aid — the bedrock of Afghanista­n’s public spending.

How global powers choose to navigate this crisis of their own making will indicate just how much attention they’ve paid to what led to the successes and failures of decades of war and occupation in Afghanista­n and Iraq. If early indication­s are anything to go by, they haven’t learned very much at all.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States