The Capital

We’re living in the age of the creative minority

- David Brooks Brooks is a columnist for The New York Times.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks once observed that being a minority in 19th-century Europe was like living in someone else’s country home. The aristocrat owned the house. Other people got to stay there but as guests. They did not get to set the rules, run the institutio­ns or dominate the culture.

Something similar can be said of America in the 1950s. But over the ensuing decades, the Protestant establishm­ent crumbled and America became more marvelousl­y diverse. If you’re reading this, there’s a good chance you’re a member of a minority group — or several. Maybe you’re Black or Jewish or Muslim. Maybe you’re gay, trans, Hispanic, Asian American, socialist, libertaria­n or Swedenborg­ian.

Even the former country house owners have come to feel like minority members. The formerly mighty mainline Protestant denominati­ons, like the Episcopali­ans and Methodists, have shrunk and lost influence. Even some of the people who used to regard themselves as part of the majority have come to feel like minorities. White evangelica­l Protestant­s are down to about 15% of the country. They vote for people like Donald Trump in part because they feel like strangers in their own land, oppressed minorities fighting for survival.

We live in an age of minorities. People assert their minority identities with justified pride. It might be most accurate to say that America is now a place of jostling minorities. The crucial questions become: How do people think about their minority group identity and how do they regard the relationsh­ips between minorities?

Historical­ly, to riff on another Sacks observatio­n, there have been at least four different minority mindsets:

First, assimilati­on. The assimilati­onists feel constricte­d by their minority identity. They want to be seen as individual­s, not as a member of some outsider category. They shed the traits that might identify themselves as Jews or Mexicans or what have you.

Second, separatism. The separatist­s want to preserve the authentici­ty of their own culture. They send their kids to schools with their own kind, socialize mostly with their own kind. They derive meaning from having a strong cohesive identity and don’t want it watered down.

Third, combat. People who take this approach see life as essentiall­y a struggle between oppressor and oppressed groups. Bigotry is so baked in that there’s no realistic hope of integratio­n. The battle must be fought against the groups that despise us and whose values are alien to us. In fact, this battle gives life purpose.

Fourth, integratio­n without assimilati­on. People who take this approach cherish their group for the way it contribute­s to the national whole. E pluribus unum. Members of this group celebrate pluralisti­c, hyphenated identities and the fluid mixing of groups that each contribute to an American identity.

Our politics is so nasty now because many people find the third mindset most compelling. Americans are a deeply religious people, especially when they think they are not being religious. And these days what I would call the religion of minoritari­anism has seized many hearts. This is the belief that history is inevitably the heroic struggle by minorities to free themselves from the yoke of majority domination. It is the belief that sin resides in the social structures imposed by majorities and that virtue and the true consciousn­ess reside with the oppressed groups.

Integratio­n without assimilati­on is the only way forward. It is, as the prophet Jeremiah suggested, to transmit the richness of your own cultures while seeking the peace and prosperity of the city to which you have been carried.

It is hard. It means socializin­g with diverse and sometimes antagonist­ic groups rather than resting in the one that feels most at home. It means recognizin­g and embracing the fact that, as an American, you contain multiple identities and cultures.

But this is the most creative way to live. It’s the clashing of different viewpoints, histories and identities within a single people and even within a single human mind. Integratio­n without assimilati­on is the nuclear reactor of American dynamism.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States