The Capital

Md. must ease tax burden on military retirees

- By Tom Jurkowsky

Gov. Wes Moore has spoken — with a proposal that would allow the state to retain and attract military veterans to Maryland. The state legislatur­e now needs to seize this opportunit­y and follow 38 other states (23 since 2018) that fully exempt military retired pay from state taxes with no age restrictio­ns. Our neighborin­g states, West Virginia and Pennsylvan­ia, have done it right. They do not tax retired military pay at all — while Maryland lags behind on this issue.

In his January State of the Commonweal­th address, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin called for eliminatin­g the tax on military retired pay, regardless of age. His proposal modifies a law passed last year that exempts up to $20,000 for retirees over 55. Even in California, the only state that fully taxes retired military pay, a bill has been introduced this year to fully exempt that pay regardless of age.

Stating he does not want to “be a farm team for Virginia” when trying to keep military retirees in Maryland, Moore is proposing legislatio­n to exempt $25,000 of military retired pay in 2023 and then $40,000 in 2024. Clearly, this is a positive step in the right direction, but more must be done for Maryland to be equally competitiv­e.

The 38 states that fully exempt military retired pay from their income tax understand that it generates more revenue. How is this possible?

The answer is simple. Individual­s who retire from active duty in the military and earn a monthly retirement pension cannot live on that stipend alone. If they have a family, living on that income is not nearly sufficient. The only way they can live is to support their military retirement by starting a second career. The income resulting from that second job is, and should be, taxable.

With that second job, a retired military person will not only pay the appropriat­e taxes but also spend his or her salary in a variety of ways in the community and in the state — rent or mortgage payments; grocery purchases; entertainm­ent expenses; and vehicle purchases, to name but a few.

Military retirees bring a wealth of experience to the table. Leadership in the workplace is the central offering. One doesn’t serve a career in the military without developing leadership skills. But retired military personnel also bring a range of technical skills and management expertise with them, including skills in informatio­n technology.

The Fort Meade Alliance, an independen­t trade group whose goal is to help drive economic growth in Maryland, says any recruiter in the Fort Meade region’s technology industry will acknowledg­e a shortage of skilled cybersecur­ity workers. The alliance says more than 20,000 cybersecur­ity jobs alone are vacant on any given day.

Clearly, Maryland is a great fit for retiring military personnel. The Department of Defense spends more than $26 billion in the state. In fact, defense spending represents 5.8% of Maryland’s GDP with more than 96,000 defense department personnel in the state. Half are in uniform and half are civilians.

Moore’s proposed legislatio­n recognizes why military retirees, or even those who simply serve a minimum amount of time, choose to leave Maryland and not take advantage of the profession­al opportunit­ies here.

It’s too expensive to live in Maryland, especially when there are other states that don’t tax military retired pay.

The Tax Foundation, a tax policy research organizati­on, recently issued its 2023 State Business Tax Climate Index. It should come as no surprise that Maryland did not score well, ranking 46th, with one of the worst tax climates. The Wall Street Journal characteri­zed the 10 lowest states as being on its tax “dishonor roll,” nothing to be proud of.

Maryland’s high tax rate and its high cost of living is not conducive to retiring military personnel. When faced with a decision about where to settle upon retirement, military personnel will choose another state that does not tax retired military pay and has a lower cost of living. That deprives Maryland of up to 25 years of potential tax revenue and disposable income for the state’s economy. The proposed legislatio­n will help alleviate that potential loss.

Military retirees are high-wage earners who represent the type of individual­s the state needs. They would help fill some of the 6,800 vacant state jobs, one of Moore’s top goals.

Several years ago the Towson University Regional Economic Studies Institute studied the financial impact of retired military service personnel on the Maryland economy. According to the study, while military retirees have access to ample employment opportunit­ies, a key factor when deciding where to live post-retirement is the tax burden.

Both the Towson study and the recent Tax Foundation report show the real economic benefits that come from making a state more competitiv­e for the long haul.

Moore’s proposed legislatio­n, if passed, will begin to allow Maryland to reap the benefits that come with creating an attractive tax environmen­t for military retirees. More importantl­y, Maryland needs to move beyond being a “farm team” and join the “big leagues” with 38 states that fully exempt military retired pay.

Tom Jurkowsky is retired Navy rear admiral who served on active duty for 31 years. He sits on the board of directors of The Military Officers Associatio­n of America, an advocacy organizati­on that supports a strong defense and those who serve and have served.

He is the author of “The Secret Sauce for Organizati­onal Success: Communicat­ions and Leadership on the Same Page.” He lives in Annapolis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States