The Capital

As Angelos drama resolves, eyes turn back to Orioles

Family agrees to drop lawsuits as personal, financial dealings neared public exposure

- By Jean Marbella and Jeff Barker

Soon, Georgia Angelos, the wife of Orioles owner Peter Angelos, would have been put under oath and questioned.

A river of documents had begun flowing — to lawyers involved in the case, if not to the public — with details including everything from private email conversati­ons to bank records to negotiatio­ns over a possible sale of the team.

That was the backdrop to Monday’s abrupt end to the legal fight that erupted within the Angelos family in the wake of the 93-year-old patriarch’s illness and subsequent incapacita­tion.

As The Baltimore Sun revealed early Monday, the lawsuits filed last year pitting younger son Louis Angelos against his brother John, the Orioles chairman and CEO, and their mother, Georgia, were withdrawn. Attorneys for all three family members, as well as a court-appointed lawyer for Peter Angelos, signed a motion to end the cases.

The terse, four-page document provided no details of why or how the cases were settled. Family members and their lawyers either declined to comment or did not return requests for comment from The Sun.

But the pace of the legal battle had intensifie­d in recent weeks.

Two weeks ago, Louis Angelos, 53, amended his original suit to allege Georgia, 81, and John Angelos 55, had transferre­d some $64 million from one of Peter Angelos’ bank accounts. The informatio­n appeared to bolster Louis Angelos’ claims that his brother, with his mother’s acquiescen­ce, was working to keep family assets from him, contrary to what Louis Angelos said was his father’s desire that they share the wealth equally.

The end to the legal battle drew positive reactions from those close to the team and the family, even as questions remained over the ultimate dispositio­n of issues raised by the litigation.

“It’s good that it’s over,” said Jim Palmer, the Oriole pitching great and analyst for the team’s Mid-Atlantic Sports Network. “If you’re a baseball fan, all you care about is are the Orioles going to stay in Baltimore? Are they going to be a viable franchise?”

While those questions went unanswered by the agreement to end the lawsuits, observers noted the focus can now turn fully toward ongoing matters: a lease for Camden Yards to replace one that expires Dec. 31, a resolution of a legal dispute over MASN rights fees and, perhaps most critical to the Orioles nation, how the team will build on last year’s surprising success to make a stronger play for the 2023 postseason.

“Now the Orioles can move forward without distractio­ns, so it’s probably good for the team,” said John Pica, a former state legislator from Baltimore and former attorney with Peter Angelos’ law firm. “I think it’s great news. I hope all parties were treated favorably.”

The Orioles and Major League Baseball did not respond to requests for comment.

The Maryland Stadium Authority, the landlord for the team’s publicly owned home, did not address the settlement when asked for comment.

Its statement said it “looks forward to continuing our work with the Baltimore Orioles toward a new long-term agreement for the beloved ballpark that would offer increased economic benefits and enjoyment to Marylander­s.”

The suits raised concerns among fans that a sale of the team could mean it would move. Louis Angelos suggested in one filing that John Angelos, who has a home in Nashville, could relocate the team to Tennessee. John Angelos has said repeatedly the team will not leave Baltimore, and sources told The Sun he wants to maintain his family’s majority ownership, even if a portion of its shares are sold.

With the stroke of an electronic court filing that appeared on the public docket Monday morning, all the charges and countercha­rges — among them that each side had financiall­y exploited the now-helpless husband and father — were dropped.

The case had largely played out in court filings and private meetings. There was a scheduling conference early on, and two hearings at which warring family members appeared in Baltimore County Circuit Court, but did not testify. Last month, there was a flurry of activity, from meetings with the judge to rulings on earlier disputes and filings.

After an extended back-and-forth over the informatio­n that needed to be produced during the discovery phase of the litigation, Louis Angelos’ attorney, Jeffrey E. Nusinov, said in a filing he’d received more than 9,000 pages of documents between Jan. 13 and Jan. 20.

Some of those documents addressed the Angelos law firm, a one-time powerhouse that won billions of dollars in asbestos and tobacco litigation, although it had shrunk with the decline in such cases. Georgia and John Angelos wanted to sell or wind down the firm, against the wishes of Louis Angelos, an attorney. He had been managing the office in his father’s absence.

On Jan. 23, Nusinov filed an amended complaint including what he called the draining of a bank account held by Peter Angelos that contained more than $65 million in 2017, when he first fell ill. It had just $400,000 remaining as of several months ago, the filing said.

The complaint also said John Angelos and his mother had increased their ownership stake in the team.

More financial informatio­n — particular­ly as it relates to the Orioles, a potential sale of the club and John Angelos’ compensati­on — was in the pipeline.

On Jan. 26, Judge Keith Truffer ordered a range of documents to be turned over to Louis Angelos and his lawyers, including from Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs, an investment firm Georgia Angelos worked with on a possible sale of the Orioles. Peter Angelos, who became incapacita­ted five years ago, had granted power of attorney to his wife.

The judge also wanted Louis Angelos’ team to receive any documents and communicat­ions regarding a possible sale of the family’s interest in the Orioles or MASN.

Truffer had set a deadline of 14 days, instructin­g Georgia and John Angelos to “produce financial statements reflecting the financial condition of the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnershi­p (“BOLP”), which includes the Orioles and the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network, from January 1, 2017, to the present.”

Further, he wrote, they also would provide documents to show “compensati­on or other benefits paid to John Angelos from January 1, 2017 to present in connection with his duties for BOLP, including his work for the Baltimore Orioles and the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network.”

Instead, the cases were dropped via the joint motion.

 ?? KENNETH K. LAM / BALTIMORE SUN ?? Baltimore lawyer Peter Angelos is pictured in his office in May 2016.
KENNETH K. LAM / BALTIMORE SUN Baltimore lawyer Peter Angelos is pictured in his office in May 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States