Europe thinking anew about nuclear deterrent
BERLIN — An idea, once unthinkable, is gaining attention in European policy circles: a European Union nuclear weapons program.
Under such a plan, France’s arsenal would be repurposed to protect the rest of Europe and would be put under a common European command, funding plan and defense doctrine, or some combination of the three. It would be enacted only if the continent could no longer count on U.S. protection.
Though no new countries would join the nuclear club under this concept, it would amount to an unprecedented escalation in Europe’s collective military power and a drastic break with U.S. leadership.
Analysts say the talk, even if it never translates into action, demonstrates the growing sense in Europe that drastic steps may be necessary to protect the postwar order in the era of a Trump presidency, a resurgent Russia and the possibility of an alignment between the two.
Even proponents, who remain a minority, acknowledge enormous hurdles. But discussion of a socalled Eurodeterrent has entered the mainstream — particularly in Germany, a country that would be central to any plan but where anti-nuclear sentiment is widespread.
Jana Puglierin of the German Council on Foreign Relations said that a handful of senior European officials had “for sure triggered a public debate about this, taking place in newspapers and journals, radio interviews and TV documentaries.”
She added: “That in itself is remarkable. I am indeed very astonished that we discuss this at all.”
Jaroslaw Kaczynski, Poland’s former prime minister and now the head of its ruling party, provided the highestlevel call for a European Union nuclear program in a February interview with a German newspaper.
But the most important support has come from Roderich Kiesewetter, a lawmaker and foreign policy spokesman with Germany’s ruling party, who gave the nuclear option increased credibility by raising it shortly after President Donald Trump’s election.
In an interview in the German Bundestag, Kiesewetter, a former colonel who served in Afghanistan, calibrated his language carefully, providing just enough detail to demonstrate the option’s seriousness without offering too much and risking an outcry from German voters or encouraging the U.S. withdrawal he is hoping to avoid.
“My idea is to build on the existing weapons in Great Britain and France,” he said, but he acknowledged that Britain’s decision to leave the European Union could preclude its participation.
The United States bases dozens of nuclear warheads in Germany, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands as both a quick-reaction force and a symbol of its guarantee to protect the continent. Kiesewetter said his plan would provide a replacement or parallel program.
This would require, he said, four ingredients: a French pledge to commit its weapons to a common European defense, German financing to demonstrate the program’s collective nature, a joint command and a plan to place French warheads in other European countries.
Separately, foreign and defense ministers of European Union members reached a deal Monday in Brussels to create a headquarters for military training operations — setting aside, at least for now, concerns that the step might lead to the establishment of a “European army” to rival NATO.
With the United States appearing to take a step back in its role in the world, the core pair of France and Germany is pushing the EU to take greater responsibility for its security.