The Columbus Dispatch

Britain pulled into wiretap tale, and it’s not happy

- By Peter Baker and Steven Erlanger

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump provoked a rare public dispute with the United States’ closest ally on Friday after his White House aired an explosive and unsubstant­iated claim that Britain’s spy agency had secretly eavesdropp­ed on him at the behest of President Barack Obama during last year’s campaign.

Livid British officials adamantly denied the allegation and secured promises from senior White House officials never to repeat it. But a defiant Trump refused to back down, making clear that the White House had nothing to retract or apologize for because his spokesman had simply repeated an assertion made by a Fox News commentato­r. Fox itself later disavowed the report.

Trump’s strained relations with Europe, which has viewed his ascension to power with trepidatio­n, were fully on display Friday, not just in the British spy flap but also in the venue in which it was addressed. The president was hosting for the first time Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany. Though polite, the two leaders seemed stiff and distant.

The angry response from Britain stemmed from Trump’s persistenc­e in accusing Obama of tapping his phones last year despite the lack of evidence and across-the-board denials. At a briefing Thursday, Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, read from a sheaf of news clippings that he suggested bolstered the president’s claim.

Among them was an assertion by Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News commentato­r, that Obama had used Britain’s Government Communicat­ions Headquarte­rs, the signals agency known as the GCHQ, to spy on Trump. In response to Spicer, the agency quickly denied it as “nonsense” and “utterly ridiculous,” while British officials contacted American counterpar­ts to complain.

“We said nothing,” Trump told a German reporter who asked about the matter at a news conference with Merkel. “All we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsibl­e for saying that on television. I didn’t make an opinion on it.” He added: “You shouldn’t be talking to me. You should be talking to Fox.”

After the news conference, Spicer echoed Trump’s unapologet­ic tone. “I don’t think we regret anything,” he told reporters. “As the president said, I was just reading off media reports.”

Shortly afterward, Fox backed off Napolitano’s claim. “Fox News cannot confirm Judge Napolitano’s commentary,” anchor Shepard Smith said on air. “Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now president of the United States was surveilled at any time, any way. Full stop.”

Trump’s unremorsef­ul tenor further stunned British officials, who thought they had managed to contain the matter. Kim Darroch, the British ambassador to the United States, had raised the matter Thursday night with Spicer at a St. Patrick’s Day reception in Washington. Mark Lyall Grant, the national security adviser to Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain, had contacted his American counterpar­t, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.

On Friday morning, a spokesman for May said the White House had backed off the allegation. “We’ve made clear to the administra­tion that these claims are ridiculous and should be ignored,” the spokesman said, on the condition of anonymity in keeping with British protocol. “We’ve received assurances these allegation­s won’t be repeated.”

But White House officials, who also requested anonymity, said Spicer had offered no regret to the ambassador. “He didn’t apologize, no way, no how,” a senior West Wing official said.

Trump’s initial allegation has been refuted by intelligen­ce agencies as well as Republican and Democratic officials.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States