Candidate Trump knew how to work with media

Dear President Trump: As a mainstream media worker, I congratulate you on the completion of your first 100 days as president without facing impeachment. For a while, I wasn’t sure that you could do it.

I also want you to know that we’re on to you. You’re not fooling anybody with your media-bashing act, even after you cranked it up by skipping the annual dinner of White House press corps in Washington to lead yet another campaign rally, this time in a farm expo center in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

Sir, has anyone told you that you can stop campaigning now? That you won? That it is time to stop campaigning and start governing?

Ah, but that’s the rub, isn’t it? You’d rather return to your comfort zone, where you can be cheered by crowds of people who already support you, than reach out as most presidents do to win new supporters or at least ease tensions with their opposition.

There in your safe space you are free to rail once again at the “failing New York Times” (which actually is doing quite well, thank you) or the “fake news” at CNN and MSNBC, among other media that — unlike, say, Fox News or Breitbart — are not your favorites.

It is obvious that you prefer to politic from a platform of appropriated victimization. Sure, your party controls both houses of Congress and most state legislatures, but you don’t let that keep you from sounding like a lonely warrior fighting for the “forgotten Americans” against — who else? — the media, whom you once again called “very dishonest people.”

“Their priorities are not my priorities, and not your priorities,” you told the mammoth crowd in Harrisburg. “If the media’s job is to be honest and tell the truth, the media deserves a very, very big fat failing grade.”

Nice work. I know you’re not dumb enough to believe all of that malarkey. Sure, you beat up on the Times, because it makes you sound big and brave to challenge the nation’s most prominent newspaper.

Yet when you wanted to get your message out that you were planning to run for president, whom did you call but Maggie Haberman at the Times, who has covered you since your younger days when you would call the city’s tabloids to give your spin on your latest divorce or offload blame for a financial loss.

No wonder you love to bash the media. We’re the perfect scapegoats. Aside from the courts, the nation’s free press is just about the only major institution left that you or your party doesn’t control. When it’s time to shift blame, where else can you go?

That’s as good — or bad — of a reason as any to explain why you skipped the annual dinner of the 103-year-old White House Correspondents Association, the first president to do so since Ronald Reagan, who had a good excuse. He had just been shot the previous month in a failed assassination attempt.

Your shyness was odd, considering how, as the Times’ Glenn Thrush noted, your “free-ranging press conferences” have been “a lot more democratic” than President Barack Obama’s tightly controlled face-offs — with their single-page lists of pre-selected reporters.

But, after watching you in October at New York’s Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, a campaign year ritual, I can see why you wanted to shy away from the black-tie correspondent’s dinner — as well as the annual whitetie dinner of the Gridiron Club, Washington’s oldest media organization, a month earlier.

At the Smith dinner, your good-natured verbal jousts with your Democratic rival Hillary Clinton kept with the dinner’s tradition but soured as your remarks turned nasty enough to elicit boos. Yes, sir, you were bombing long before you sent missiles into Syria.

It’s not that we who attended the correspondents’ dinner didn’t have a good time without you. We did. But it’s a sad commentary on our times that our president would rather drive more wedges between the media and the audiences that we serve than to take some time to strengthen his own relationship with us.