The Columbus Dispatch

Behavior requires more than a discussion

- MARIE MCINTYRE Marie G. McIntyre is a workplace coach and the author of “Secrets to Winning at Office Politics.”

Q: I have two pairs of employees who can’t seem to get along. The first pair talks so much trash about their co-workers that people from other department­s have told me about their comments. The second pair just tries to keep their distance and never makes nasty remarks.

I am concerned about the two troublemak­ers and plan to call them in and repeat what I have been told. They will, no doubt, want to know who complained, but because I received this informatio­n in confidence, I don’t think I should reveal my sources.

I’m sure they will make excuses for their behavior and I expect the drama to continue. However, I just want to let them know that I’m in the loop on the office grapevine. Does this sound like a good plan?

A: Well, you do have a couple of things right. Talking with the agitators is definitely a priority. Their public trash talk is not only escalating the conflict but also hurting the reputation of your group.

Keeping sources confidenti­al is also a wise move. When employees are told about complaints, they often indignantl­y demand to know who made them. But you are not obligated to divulge that informatio­n.

However, your plan does have one glaringly obvious deficiency — that is, you are making absolutely no effort to actually solve the problem.

Start by informing the two troublemak­ers that their snarky remarks must stop. Then give all four squabblers the nonnegotia­ble goal of resolving their disagreeme­nts. While they don’t have to like each other, they do need to act like mature adults.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States