The Columbus Dispatch

Politics does not have to be dishonorab­le

- EJ DIONNE E.J. Dionne writes for the Washington Post Writers Group. ejdionne@washpost.com

Permit me to confess: I am one of the very last people in the United States who does not consider the word “politician” to be an insult. On the contrary, the work politician­s do is important because politics is a good and essential thing in a free society. It’s the degradatio­n of politics in the Trump era we need to worry about, not politics itself.

“The business of politics is the conciliati­on of differing interests,” Bernard Crick wrote in his still-valuable 1962 book “In Defense of Politics.” Note that word “conciliati­on.” Politics in a democratic republic assumes that we can find ways of living, working and progressin­g together even when we disagree.

One of the best descriptio­ns of what our aspiration­s should be was offered by the political philosophe­r Michael Sandel. “When politics goes well,” he wrote, “we can know a good in common that we cannot know alone.”

Being an anti-politician is supposed to be one of President Trump’s greatest assets. But he has thrown our government into chaos and our country into tumult precisely because his disrespect for politics and what it requires leads him to debase our public life. He offers a torrent of lies, willfully tries to tear the country apart and puts everyone else down because doing so is the only way he knows how to lift himself up.

Many of Trump’s lies are hideously personal. His false charge that President Obama failed to phone or speak to the families of members of the armed services killed in the line of duty was particular­ly sordid.

It has become a dreary Washington game to ask at what point Republican politician­s (besides Sens. Bob Corker and John McCain and a few others) will stand up for basic decency by telling Trump: Enough. Up to now, most have cravenly absorbed all manner of insults, accepted unspeakabl­e unseemline­ss, and sat by with wan smiles as Trump left them hanging by shifting his positions moment to moment.

On Tuesday, Trump suggested he would back a bill negotiated by Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Patty Murray, D-Wash., to stabilize the Affordable Care Act’s insurance markets. But on Wednesday, the president tweeted that while he was “supportive of Lamar as a person,” he could “never support bailing out ins co’s who have made a fortune w/ O’Care.” Not to worry. Alexander said the president had called him to be “encouragin­g about the bipartisan agreement.” Trump’s incomprehe­nsible signaling, in Alexander’s view, was an effort “to reserve his options.”

Sorry, but all Republican politician­s who take their obligation­s seriously must stop rationaliz­ing the irrational and say what has long been obvious, that Trump’s way of doing business is unproducti­ve, erratic, mean and scary. Until this happens, Republican­s deserve to be seen as enablers of a dangerous presidency.

Alas, you can count on GOP leaders to maintain their complicity until the tax cut that is their lodestar is enacted into law.

But is a tax cut worth the price of colluding to undermine an honorable profession?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States