The Columbus Dispatch

New flight paths lead to jet-noise complaints across US

- By Anita Snow and Joan Lowy

PHOENIX — Airliners began flying over Twila Lake’s bungalow-style house in a historic district three years ago, taking off every one to two minutes from the Phoenix airport and roaring over her neighborho­od. It was a sudden change after she had rarely heard jets in her previous 13 years in the downtown neighborho­od.

Now, “it’s all day and night long,” complained the 71-year-old retiree, who said she sleeps with the television on to drown out aircraft noise. Some neighbors sold their homes and moved after the aviation-highway entrance ramp was routed overhead.

The Federal Aviation Administra­tion started revising flight paths and procedures around the United States in 2014 under its air-traffic-control modernizat­ion plan known as NextGen. The new procedures use more precise, satellite-based navigation that saves time, increases the number of planes that airports can service, and reduces fuel burn and emissions.

The FAA announced in March that it plans to implement NextGen in Columbus in late 2018 or early 2019. Officials have said that overall aircraft noise is not expected to increase, but the rerouting of planes will mean that some neighborho­ods not previously in the flight path might see and hear planes more often.

The Columbus Regional Airport Authority has for years administer­ed a program with the FAA that pays for soundproof­ing of some homes in areas most affected by aircraft operations. The FAA and the airport authority have not said whether that could be expanded or changed as a result of the NextGen changes.

Noise complaints exploded from San Diego to Charlotte, North Carolina, to New York as flights were concentrat­ed at lower altitudes, in narrower paths and on more frequent schedules. The new paths often reduce the number of people exposed to noise, but those who get noise get it far more consistent­ly.

Those airports are larger and busier than John Glenn Columbus Internatio­nal Airport, which ranks 49th among commercial airports in the U.S., according to FAA figures.

In Phoenix, redrawn flights over vintage neighborho­ods such as Lake’s affect about 2,500 homes, prompting a court challenge from historic districts and the city.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed on Aug. 29 with the plaintiffs’ assessment that the FAA was “arbitrary and capricious” in revising flight procedures. The case remains before the court.

Local government­s and residents in more than a half-dozen other areas — including Washington’s Georgetown neighborho­od and California’s Newport Beach, Laguna Beach, Orange County and Culver City — have similar petitions before the court.

Attorney Steven Taber, who represents several Southern California communitie­s with complaints, predicted that legal action over flight changes will be a continuing problem across the U.S.

Aviation experts said they don’t expect the Phoenix ruling to set a precedent for other cities, but it is forcing the FAA to be more responsive.

“We certainly view it as one of the mostegregi­ous cases of a lack of community involvemen­t,” said Chris Oswald, vice president of safety and regulatory affairs with Airports Council Internatio­nalNorth America. The FAA has since done more outreach elsewhere, he said.

Policy analyst Rui Neiva of the Eno Center for Transporta­tion research group in Washington, D.C., said agency officials must find a middle ground.

“In some cases, they may have to settle on a path that is less efficient, or create several additional paths,” he said.

But David Grizzle, a former FAA chief operating officer, said it’s not possible to redesign procedures to address the problem and still reap NextGen’s technology advantages.

“There is an intrinsic issue of concentrat­ing noise in particular places that comes with precision-based navigation that is inescapabl­e,” he said.

FAA officials knew a decade ago that some homeowners would experience more noise because of the changes, but the officials hoped that the complaints would be offset by the people who benefited, Grizzle said. But those people haven’t spoken up.

The FAA said it is reviewing the Phoenix decision and working with residents near airports around the country through “noise roundtable­s” to balance community interests with needed improvemen­ts to the national airspace system.

Complaints have arisen that the FAA failed to adequately explain the planned changes or provide opportunit­ies to comment. In Columbus, the FAA announceme­nt was reported on in local media in March, and the public-comment period ran through late September.

In some areas, people say they didn’t know that changes were coming because the FAA advertised them in places where people wouldn’t normally look, such as government webpages.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States