The Columbus Dispatch

Agency already violating new policy?

- By Randy Ludlow

After The Dispatch revealed that the Ohio Department of Administra­tive Services awarded $15 million in unbid contracts to favored informatio­ntechnolog­y consultant­s, the agency promised to clean up its act.

Administra­tive Services enacted a policy this year in which it pledged to obtain price quotes from at least three pre-qualified vendors before awarding state contracts, with any falling short of that standard to be taken before the Controllin­g Board of state lawmakers for approval.

A report commission­ed by Ohio’s inspector general indicates the new policy to ensure competitio­n and protect taxpayer dollars apparently didn’t survive three months without

violation.

“Anecdotal evidence ... suggests inappropri­ate ( i. e. abusive) contractin­g may have occurred with the intent to circumvent the new three quotes/ Controllin­g Board notificati­on requiremen­t,” wrote the analysts from Procuremen­t Integrity Consulting Services. “Data indicates a circumvent­ion of the competitiv­e requiremen­ts.”

Regardless whether the intent was “self- serving ( and) malicious” or motivated by “mission success,” state practices to route contracts to preferred vendors “does not send a message of any commitment to procuremen­t integrity” within Administra­tive Services’ informatio­n- technology office, the report said.

Administra­tive Services spokesman Tom Hoyt said agency officials did not know what the report was addressing in its suggestion that the new policy had been sidesteppe­d. The report provided no specifics.

The expert report underlined the finding of the office of Inspector General Randall J. Meyer that the agency committed wrongdoing in ducking competitiv­e practices and handing out pricey unbid contracts to consultant­s who advised Chief

Informatio­n Officer Stuart Davis and other top state IT officials.

The report ripped Administra­tive Services’ procuremen­t practices, finding that no- bid contracts were given to Columbus- based Advocate Solutions and Stonyhurst Consulting, of Middleburg, Virginia, for years with little justificat­ion, few demands for accountabi­lity, no performanc­e measures and little regard for taxpayers’ dollars.

The examinatio­n found that Advocate Vice President Rex Plouck, a deputy state chief informatio­n officer who once worked with Davis, was paid up to $ 216 an hour — a rate 21 to 38 percent higher than five other similarly qualified contractor­s.

Stonyhurst co- owner Steve Zielenski commanded similar hourly rates for his no- bid work, which cost 20 to 34 percent more than the work of similar IT consultant­s, the report said. If a competitiv­e process had been used on some work he received and other equally qualified consultant­s chosen, the state could have saved nearly $ 439,000, the report said.

The agency’s use of no- bid contracts “was not done to obtain the best cost for the benefit of the state” and deprived qualified vendors of a “fair, open and transparen­t” process in which they could win state work, the report said.

The Dispatch uncovered that Advocate, which employs several former state IT officials, received at least $ 12 million in unbid work between 2011 and early this year while Stonyhurst received at least $ 3 million. Administra­tive Services’ purchasing analysts long had objected to the lack of competitio­n for consulting work, with their concerns overridden by superiors such as Davis.

The Procuremen­t Integrity report also was critical of the so- called “letter of interest” that was used to give work to Stonyhurst. The letter allows state agencies to request the award of an unbid contract to a specific vendor, an approach that “can be abused as it gives the perception of selecting a preferred favorite contractor” and “can create a corrupt environmen­t” inviting bribes and pay- toplay schemes, the report said.

Meyer has signaled that more investigat­ive reports on Administra­tive Services’ contractin­g practices are forthcomin­g. He asked the agency’s leaders to respond to his recommenda­tions to improve its handling of IT contracts. Lawmakers from both parties have called for reforms in the wake of Monday’s report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States