The Columbus Dispatch

Net neutrality puts providers in crosshairs

- By Tali Arbel

NEW YORK — Now that federal telecom regulators have repealed net neutrality, it may be time to brace for the arrival of internet “fast lanes” and “slow lanes.”

The net neutrality rules just voted down by the Federal Communicat­ions Commission prohibited such “paid

prioritiza­tion,” as it’s technicall­y known. That’s when an internet provider such as Verizon or Comcast decides to charge services like YouTube or Amazon for faster access to users. Firms that decline to pay up could wind up in bumper-to-bumper slow lanes.

Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., with the support of Rep. Steve Stivers, R-Upper Arlington, has introduced legislatio­n in the House to offset the FCC’s action and maintain a “free and open” internet, but for now net neutrality looks to be a thing of the past.

So the Associated Press queried seven major internet providers about their postnet-neutrality plans, and all of them equivocate­d when asked if they might establish fast and slow lanes. None of the seven companies — Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, Charter, Cox, Sprint and T-Mobile — would rule out the possibilit­y. Most merely said they had “no plans” for paid prioritiza­tion, and a few declined to answer the question at all.

By contrast, several of these firms promised not to block or slow down specific internet sites and services, two other practices prohibited by the expiring net-neutrality rules. (Those rules won’t formally end until sometime in early 2018.) Any such move could set off a public uproar and might even trigger an antitrust investigat­ion.

Here are the net-neutrality promises from the country’s biggest wireless and cable companies.

VERIZON

response

No specific

Says it doesn’t do so but declined to address the future

In a Nov. 21 statement , Verizon senior vice president Kathy Grillo said: “We continue to believe that users should be able to access the internet when, where, and how they choose, and our customers will continue to do so.” Asked whether Verizon will continue not to block or throttle content or whether it will charge internet companies to get better access to customers, Young said Verizon “does not block or throttle content and that’s the bottom line.”

AT&T

response

COMCAST

No specific Says it

“will not” do so

Spokesman Mike Balmoris didn’t specifical­ly answer when asked if AT&T will create fast lanes. In a Nov. 30 blog post, AT&T senior executive vice president Bob Quinn said: “We will not block websites, we will not throttle or degrade internet traffic based on content, and we will not unfairly discrimina­te in our treatment of internet traffic.” Has “no plans” to create them Says it content on the Internet; we will be fully transparen­t with respect to our practices; and we have not entered into any paid prioritiza­tion arrangemen­ts, and we have no plans to do so.”

CHARTER

Says there are no plans to create them

Says it doesn’t do so and has “no plans” to change that

In a Dec. 14 blog post: “We don’t slow down, block, or discrimina­te against lawful content. Simply put, we don’t interfere with the lawful online practices of our customers and we have no plans to change our practices.”

COX

create them

Does not plan to

Says it doesn’t do so and has no plans to

The words: In an emailed statement on Dec. 14: “We do not block, throttle or otherwise interfere with consumers’ desire to go where they want on the Internet.” A spokesman said the company has no plans to block or throttle content or enter into paid prioritiza­tion agreements.

SPRINT

response

T-MOBILE

No specific

Says it doesn’t block sites but declined to address the future

In a news release on Dec. 14, Sprint wrote: “Our position has been and continues to be that competitio­n is the best way to promote an open internet.”

From its “open internet” website: “Sprint does not block sites based on content or subject.”

“will not” do so

In a Dec. 14 blog post , senior executive vice president David Cohen said: “We will not block, throttle, or discrimina­te against lawful

No response about future plans

No response about future plans

The words: A company spokeswoma­n pointed to a February 2015 statement from T-Mobile CEO John Legere: “We have always believed in competitio­n and in a free, open Internet with rules that protect net neutrality — no blocking, no discrimina­tion and transparen­cy.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States