The Columbus Dispatch

Family’s privilege doesn’t spare it from misery

- By Justin Chang

Each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way, except perhaps in the films of Austrian writer-director Michael Haneke — in which domestic misery tends to express itself as repetitive, even ritualisti­c patterns.

Haneke has turned the repetition into a joke of sorts: In most of his films, you are likely to encounter the names Georges and Anne (or Georg and Anna) and maybe the face of his frequent on-screen muse, the brilliant French actress Isabelle Huppert.

The forces bedeviling these families vary in nature — an apocalypti­c disaster in “Time of the Wolf,” inexplicab­le suicidal urges in “The Seventh Continent,” memories of past transgress­ions in “Cache.”

If you see enough of them, Theatre

you soon realize that every tormentor is a front for Haneke himself.

Nearly all of his films are predicated on a kind of home invasion.

No locks get broken in Haneke’s “Happy End,” an unhappy-family drama every bit as devious as its pokerfaced title.

The film represents a more playful, slippery version of a story that Haneke has never really stopped telling: Steadily and ruthlessly, he chips away at an upperclass Western family whose members are ensconced in their own privilege.

The Laurents are a multigener­ational clan living in a large house in the French coastal city of Calais. The patriarch is Georges (Jean-Louis Trintignan­t), a widower just shy of his 85th birthday.

His brittle, exceedingl­y competent daughter, Anne (Huppert), runs the family’s constructi­on business and tries to groom her volatile man-child son, Pierre (Franz Rogowski), for a prominent role in the company.

Anne’s weaker-willed brother, Thomas (Mathieu Kassovitz), is a doctor with a wife, Anaïs (Laura Verlinden), and an infant son.

We meet the Laurents in the context of two crises: A wall collapses at a company constructi­on site, injuring an employee. And Thomas’ 13-year-old daughter from a previous marriage, Eve (Fantine Harduin), moves in with them after her mother falls gravely ill.

Both inciting tragedies are shown, or at least suggested, by a secondary camera. The sense of chilly, detached observatio­n persists inside the Laurents’ home, where no tragedy seems capable of disrupting the family’s routine.

Unfolding as a series of brisk, meticulous­ly composed, perfectly acted scenes held together with little or no exposition, “Happy End” is diffuse in its storytelli­ng — no single character emerges as the protagonis­t.

Again and again, the director sows seeds of dread and disaster, only to uproot them before they can blossom into full-on horror. Tension convulses the picture whenever Eve, a disaffecte­d teen played with breathtaki­ng poise by Harduin, finds herself alone with her baby brother.

If “Happy End” is something of a bad-seed nightmare, though, it turns out to be an unpredicta­ble one, marked by unexpected flashes of warmth, sympathy and blistering humor.

A curious bond develops between Eve and her grandfathe­r, Georges — one predicated not on love or affection but on a mutual disdain for the adults around them as well as a shared suspicion that life might not be worth living.

Haneke has often been dinged as both a punishing moralist and a perversely withholdin­g storytelle­r. So it’s fitting that his masterstro­ke in “Happy End,” delivered almost with a shrug, is the withholdin­g of punishment.

A more redemptive, politicall­y righteous movie might have held its characters to account for their callous indifferen­ce.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States