The Columbus Dispatch

Education merger intended to create better workforce

- By Jim Siegel jsiegel@dispatch.com @phrontpage

As House Republican­s kicked off hearings Tuesday for a bill aimed at dismantlin­g much of the Ohio Department of Education, questions remain about the exact problems it seeks to address.

Rep. Bill Reineke, R-Tiffin, laid out a litany of goals and statistics highlighti­ng the need to improve an education system where just 43 percent of working-age adults in Ohio have postsecond­ary degrees, but an estimated 64 percent of Ohio jobs will need such degrees by 2020.

For some, it's a question of whether the Department of Education is doing enough to help students attain skills needed for tomorrow's jobs — or if those in power have enough control over the process.

“Poor accountabi­lity, politics and mission fog are three flaws that lead to an outcome where policies set by the General Assembly and governor are second-guessed and operationa­l performanc­e is poor, which leads to substandar­d educationa­l outcomes for our students,” Reineke told a House committee.

Under House Bill 512, the state department­s of Education and Higher Education would merge with the Governor’s Office of Workforce Transforma­tion, creating a new cabinet-level agency led by a governor’s appointee.

The bill is largely aimed at the Ohio Department of Education — the only one of the three agencies not under the governor’s direct control. The state superinten­dent is appointed by the state Board of Education.

In mid-2016, state Auditor Dave Yost called it “among the worst, if not the worst-run state agency in state government.” Some Republican­s have been critical of how it has calculated report card scores and how it dealt with the politicall­y influentia­l Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow, which recently closed.

Gov. John Kasich has said he wants control over the department.

Reineke said no layoffs are anticipate­d and cost savings would be minimal.

“Higher education in all its forms ... can no longer be managed separately from primary and secondary schools,” he said.

Supporters say the new Ohio Department of Learning and Achievemen­t would streamline education decisions and place more accountabi­lity on the governor. Critics are calling it a power grab.

“There's no excuse for taking control from Ohio voters and giving it to yourself — especially when it comes to our children's education,” Sen. Joe Schiavoni, D-Boardman, wrote in a tweet. He is running to be the next governor.

The Ohio Constituti­on requires that a state Board of Education exist and that it appoint the state superinten­dent. However, their duties are set in state law and can be changed by lawmakers.

The bill would not change the makeup of the state Board of Education — 11 elected members and eight appointed by the governor. But its rule-making power would be siphoned off, making it more of a quasi-judicial board on par with other, more minor state boards and commission­s.

The state Board of Education would retain some responsibi­lities, including issuing teacher licenses and disciplina­ry action. However, the new Department of Learning and Achievemen­t would adopt all rules and qualificat­ions related to those licenses.

The board would oversee appeals of charter sponsor denials, but the new department would be responsibl­e for initially granting a request to change sponsors.

The bill also would give the state superinten­dent power to directly authorize new charter schools through the Office of Ohio School Sponsorshi­p, but that office moves to the new Department of Learning and Achievemen­t.

Rep. Bill Blessing, R-Cincinnati, chairman of the committee, said the consolidat­ion would allow the agencies to discuss issues more closely, but for now, he's remaining neutral.

“I’m waiting to see what concerns pop up,” he said.

Traditiona­l public education groups oppose the bill.

Rep. Ryan Smith, R-Bidwell, said it’s too early to say if he supports the merger.

“I’m fascinated by the discussion, because I think it will help us uncover some of the issues people are frustrated with and see if restructur­ing actually helps,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States