The Columbus Dispatch

Taft disrespect­ed Ohio Constituti­on

-

Former Ohio Gov. Bob Taft’s op-ed “Plan streamline­s, improves state education system” in Friday’s Dispatch lacked respect for the Ohio constituti­onal provision that establishe­d a state board of education and superinten­dent of public instructio­n selected by the board. The rationale for his support of House Bill 512 focuses on the notion that the transfer of the Ohio Department of Education to the governor’s office is the silver bullet to improvemen­t of educationa­l opportunit­ies and student outcomes.

The assumption that merging the governance of K-12 public education, higher education and the Governor’s Office of Workforce Developmen­t into a super agency in the governor’s office would improve education in Ohio is an unsubstant­iated hunch — a mere feeling. There is no evidence to support that assertion.

Beyond the issue of control, there is a constituti­onal problem with the merger plan. Ohioans passed a constituti­onal amendment in 1953 to remove the superinten­dent of public instructio­n and department of education from the governor’s office by establishi­ng a state board of education. The enabling legislatio­n provided for an allelected state board, one member from each congressio­nal district.

HB 512 transfers the department and most of the duties of the state board to the governor’s office, which leaves a hollow shell of the board and superinten­dent of public instructio­n in place.

This proposal is an egregious ruse that mocks Ohio’s highest governing document — the Ohio Constituti­on.

If streamlini­ng the system is the goal as suggested by Taft, it would be reasonable for higher education and the Office of Workforce Developmen­t to be transferre­d to the constituti­onal body — the Ohio Board of Education.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States