The Columbus Dispatch

Context important in assessing woman’s past secrets

- — Portland, Oregon — Far Away Write to Carolyn — whose column appears on Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays — at tellme@washpost.com.

Dear Carolyn: Recently, I began an invigorati­ng flirtation with a woman at work — movies, jogging after work, dinner at home, etc. Last week, she told me she’d been involved in an extended affair with a married man three or four years earlier. She was also living with another man at the time. The news came as a huge disappoint­ment, and I’m wondering how much importance to attach to her history of lengthy deception.

I think there’s a risk of your blowing this out of proportion, so I’ll be conservati­ve and put its importance somewhere between “staggering” and “colossal.”

Integrity isn’t just a four-syllable word. If this woman doesn’t have it, the jogging better be awfully good.

Note the flagrant use of “if.” I could argue that her long-term deceptions guarantee she’s integritys­tarved, but that would deny her the opportunit­y almost every one of us wants out of life at least once: to be able to make a godawful mistake, to have an epiphany as a result, and to be accepted ever after for both the epiphany and the mistake, and not merely for the mistake.

So about that epiphany. Did she have one? Specifical­ly, did she treat her behavior with the appropriat­e dose of self-loathing, and is she living proof that it worked? It isn’t too early to tell; just recall what else she said when she delivered the news. Context speaks louder than words.

Dear Carolyn: I’m in a longdistan­ce relationsh­ip with someone younger and still in school. I want to spend the rest of my life with this person, but I worry I am a crutch keeping them from getting to the same point in maturity where I am now. How can I stop enabling dependence without harming our relationsh­ip?

Be willing to harm the relationsh­ip. Sounds callous, but look at it this way and it’s the only unselfish course: Which is better, to want what’s best for each other at the possible expense of your relationsh­ip, or to want the relationsh­ip at the possible expense of each other?

If you believe your student belovednes­s isn’t ready for long-term commitment, end the commitment. I know some will cry condescens­ion since it appears you’re deciding unilateral­ly what’s best for your younger, lessmature partner.

But you’re really deciding how to look out for yourself. Either you’re comfortabl­e with this person’s maturity and independen­ce, or you think she/he has a way to go. Either you think staying together is healthy, or you think freedom will be. Either this person makes you happy as-is, or it’s better, for you, to stay in touch but see other people. Just be honest in how you word that: “I want you to choose me after you’ve lived more of life.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States