The Columbus Dispatch

Justices seem uncertain on redistrict­ing issue

- By Mark Sherman

WASHINGTON — Dealing with an issue that could affect elections across the country, Supreme Court justices wrestled Wednesday with how far states may go to craft electoral districts that give the majority party a huge political advantage.

But even as they heard their second case on partisan redistrict­ing in six months, the justices expressed uncertaint­y about the best way to deal with a problem that several said would get worse without the court’s interventi­on.

The arguments the court heard Wednesday were over an appeal by Republican voters in Maryland who object to a congressio­nal district that Democrats drew to elect a candidate of their own. The Maryland case is a companion to one from Wisconsin in which Democrats complain about Ashley Oleson, with the League of Women Voters of Maryland, carries signs representi­ng that state’s congressio­nal districts as nonpartisa­n groups protest gerrymande­ring Wednesday in front of the Supreme Court.

a Republican-drawn map of legislativ­e districts. That case was argued in October and remains undecided.

Justice Stephen Breyer suggested the court could add in yet a third case involving North Carolina’s congressio­nal districts and set another round of arguments to deal with all three states.

His comment is an

indication that the justices haven’t yet figured out the Wisconsin case. More importantl­y, it suggests that Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote almost certainly controls the outcome, has reservatio­ns about using the Wisconsin case for the court’s first-ever ruling on whether districtin­g plans that entrench one party’s control of a legislatur­e or congressio­nal delegation can violate the constituti­onal rights of the other party’s voters.

The Maryland lawsuit offers the court a morelimite­d approach to dealing with the issue because it involves just one district that flipped from Republican to Democratic control after the 2011 round of redistrict­ing.

There was broad agreement that the Republican voters who sued presented what Justice Sonia Sotomayor called “pretty damning” evidence that the Democrats who controlled the state government wanted to increase the Democrats’ edge in the congressio­nal from 6-2 to 7-1.

If the court doesn’t confront the big issues now, Breyer said, sophistica­ted map-makers using increasing­ly powerful technology will create more effective partisan maps after the 2020 census.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States