The Columbus Dispatch

Few get lung cancer screening

- By Marilyn Marchione

Lung cancer screening has proved to be stunningly unpopular. Five years after government and private insurers started paying for it, less than 2 percent of 7.6 million eligible current and former smokers have sought the free scans, researcher­s report.

The study didn’t explore why, but experts say possible explanatio­ns include worries about false alarms and follow-up tests, a doctor visit to get the scans covered, fear and denial of the consequenc­es of smoking and little knowledge that screening exists.

“People are not aware that this is a test that can actually save lives,” said Dr. Richard Schilsky. “It’s not invasive, it’s not painful, there’s no prep, nothing has to be stuck into any body cavity,” so to see so little use “is shocking.”

Schilsky is chief medical officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which released the study Wednesday in advance of the group’s meeting next month.

Lung cancer is the top cancer killer worldwide, causing 155,000 deaths in the United States each year. It’s usually found too late for treatment to succeed.

A big study found that annual lowdose CT scans, a type of X-ray, could find cases sooner and lower the risk of dying of lung cancer by 20 percent for those at highest risk.

In 2013, a government task force and others backed screening for such folks.The scans cost $100 to $250 and are free for those who meet the criteria, but people must have a special appointmen­t to discuss risks and benefits with a doctor.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States