The Columbus Dispatch

Correcting employee requires higher-ups’ support

- Marie G. McIntyre is a workplace coach and the author of “Secrets to Winning at Office Politics.” Send in questions and get free coaching tips at www.youroffice coach.com, or follow her on Twitter @officecoac­h.

Marie McIntyre

Q: One of my employees is impossible to manage. “Amy” fails to follow required procedures, refuses to collaborat­e with others, and consistent­ly ignores instructio­ns. Her behavior is so disruptive that people avoid working with her on projects.

After receiving numerous complaints from both customers and staff members, I have concluded that this cannot continue. I intend to have a serious talk with Amy and specifical­ly outline the changes required if she is to remain with our team. However, I have some concerns about taking this step.

On four previous occasions, Amy complained to human resources after I gave her some constructi­ve criticism. As a result, my boss called me in for a coaching session on the best way to communicat­e with her. Now I’m afraid that he might undermine my corrective action plan. How should I handle this?

A: As you have unfortunat­ely learned, successful­ly addressing performanc­e issues requires higherleve­l support. Otherwise, the problemati­c employee might simply bypass you in an effort to nullify your feedback. So before making a fifth attempt to correct Amy’s conduct, you must be sure that management is firmly in your corner.

Provide your boss with a detailed account of how Amy’s actions are hurting the business. Complaints from customers and colleagues should certainly get his attention. Explain how you intend to proceed and ask him to approve Amy’s performanc­e-improvemen­t plan. Then repeat this process with human resources.

Given Amy’s history, you might also consider inviting your manager to sit in on the discussion with her. Although you should be the one to deliver the feedback, a higher-level presence sends the message that her rebellious behavior will no longer be tolerated.

The hope, of course, is that Amy can reform, but entrenched personalit­y traits are difficult to change. Therefore, you must also agree with your boss on the consequenc­es of continued misconduct. And Amy must clearly understand this as well.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States