The Columbus Dispatch

ACT, SAT tests aren’t just for colleges

- The Chicago Tribune

Aquick pop quiz: The University of Chicago surprised the education world when it decided to A) no longer require applicants to submit ACT or SAT scores; B) move to Indiana; C) stop admitting students from Canada; or D) issue each student a comfort pet.

Did you choose A? Good.

In an effort to lower barriers to admission, U. of C. has become the first top-10 research university to make submitting standardiz­ed test scores optional. The school coupled its decision with a few other changes — including expanded financial aid and scholarshi­p opportunit­ies — to increase access for first-generation, low-income and minority students.

Instead, the university says it will take a “holistic” approach to its admissions decisions, focusing more on students’ essays, transcript­s, letters of recommenda­tion, video introducti­ons and other nontraditi­onal materials.

This is a big change for the famously selective institutio­n (it admitted just 7 percent of aspirants who applied for the 2018-19 school year), so it’s tempting to put a lot of weight on U. of C.’s choice. But it’s just the latest school to hop on the test-optional trend: Over the past 14 years, more than 200 colleges and universiti­es have decided to ditch standardiz­ed tests as essential admission criteria, according to the National Center for Fair and Open Testing.

Which brings us to a question a lot of high-schoolers likely are asking themselves: Why bother with these tests at all?

This isn’t a trick question, promise. The answer is simple: Because standardiz­ed tests matter for more than just college admissions.

For example: The Tribune reported in October 2017 that “two-thirds of Illinois public high schools posted below-average to rockbottom scores” on the SAT administer­ed across the state the previous spring.

SAT test scores are supposed to reflect students’ college readiness and their ability to meet academic standards in math, reading and writing. Illinois students could barely hit the average.

And while some of the low scores could be explained away by a recent statewide switch from the ACT to the SAT, it’s dishearten­ing to see students struggle with what is essentiall­y a cumulative assessment of all they’ve learned in 12 years of school.

It can be hard to tell when schools are failing students. Standardiz­ed tests — for all their flaws — offer a uniform measure of accountabi­lity. They’re useful to evaluate individual student growth, measure teacher performanc­e, and marshal federal and state funds. When taken in considerat­ion with school attendance, graduation rates, advanced course offerings and collegeenr­ollment numbers, test scores help paint a picture of the health of a school and its district.

Yes, there are problems with these tests. Those who have the money can game the system by paying for tutors or by taking the test multiple times. That’s why colleges are moving away from the ACT and SAT as indicators of a student’s “fit.”

But these tests aren’t just for colleges. They’re yardsticks for parents, lawmakers and — most important — students.

So if universiti­es decide to skip the test, fine. But we hope high schoolers continue to show up on Test Day — with No. 2 pencils sharpened and at the ready.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States