The Columbus Dispatch

Yes: Rolling back rules has helped economy bloom

- Glenn Spencer is senior vice president of employment policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He wrote this for InsideSour­ces. com.

Glenn Spencer

As Labor Day dawns, the American economy is in good health. Unemployme­nt remains under 4 percent, more than 2.4 million jobs have been created since Labor Day last year, and GDP has expanded briskly. While there are many factors responsibl­e for our current state of affairs, regulatory reform must be included on the list.

This has been particular­ly true in the area of labor law. Take, for example, the Department of Labor.

During the previous administra­tion, there was a general tone implying that businesses were bad actors. An entire strategy was built around shaming employers and attempting to punish them even before allegation­s were fully adjudicate­d.

Under the Trump administra­tion, this attitude has changed.

First, the department repealed two Obama-era guidance documents from the Wage and Hour Division: one that held businesses at fault for workplaces they don’t own or manage, and another that sought to limit strictly the use of independen­t contractor­s.

The Labor Department also withdrew an Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion policy that allowed union organizers to accompany government officials on inspection­s of non-union worksites. It also repealed the “persuader rule,” which sought to prevent employers from getting confidenti­al legal advice regarding unions.

While these are just a few examples, it is clear that the Labor Department is now emphasizin­g a common-sense approach to regulation and enforcemen­t.

One can also look at the National Labor Relations Board, where the new majority has taken important steps to restore balance to labor law. The board is reviewing the Purple Communicat­ions decision, an Obamaera ruling that could essentiall­y take away an employer’s ability to control his or her own e-mail systems. It has already overturned the Specialty Healthcare ruling that allowed unions to form small, fractured bargaining units, even in workplaces where a majority of employees have rejected unionizati­on.

In addition, the NLRB has done away with the Obama-era policy of scrutinizi­ng employee handbooks, under which the board could create laborlaw violations out of commonplac­e and common-sense handbook policies. These included, for example, requiring courtesy in the workplace. Somehow the previous administra­tion considered requiring profession­al behavior at work against the law.

These positive trends have unleashed new growth and opportunit­ies for nearly all sectors of the economy, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce urges Congress and the administra­tion to continue to enact progrowth policies and effective regulatory reform.

However, a few clouds remain on the horizon, as illustrate­d by legislatio­n recently introduced by Senate Democrats that would undermine the strong economic growth we are now seeing.

These bills, given benevolent-sounding titles like the Workplace Democracy Act and the Workers’ Freedom to Negotiate Act, would eliminate right-to-work laws in 27 states, once again forcing employees to pay union dues or lose their jobs. Both bills would strip away the democratic protection­s of a secret ballot during union organizing elections, exposing workers to coercion and intimidati­on.

They would impose mandatory, binding arbitratio­n for first contracts — potentiall­y sticking workers and employers with unworkable contract terms.

And most damaging, they would repeal the ban on secondary boycotts, meaning that a labor dispute with a single company could suddenly involve dozens of other businesses, giving unions a license to shut down entire segments of the economy.

While these bills will not be going anywhere in the current Congress, these radical proposals must not be ignored.

This administra­tion deserves credit for giving businesses new opportunit­ies, which have allowed our economy to prosper. Given the right circumstan­ces, and continued regulatory reform, it should continue to do so.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States