The Columbus Dispatch

Finally, definition of yogurt appears on way

- By Candice Choi

NEW YORK — If low-fat yogurt is blended with fatty ingredient­s like coconut or chocolate, is it still low- fat? Is it even yogurt?

The U.S. government has rules about what can be called “yogurt,” and the dairy industry says it’s not clear what the answers are. Now it’s hopeful it will finally get to use the term with greater liberty, with the Trump administra­tion in the process of updating the yogurt definition.

The industry push to open up the yogurt standard illustrate­s how fraught it can be to define a food, especially as manufactur­ing practices and consumer tastes change.

Government standards exist for a range of packaged foods, mostly for onetime pantry staples such as bread, jam and canned peas.

The standards were supposed to ensure a level of quality as mass production took hold decades ago.

But writing those rules sometimes turned into a bureaucrat­ic nightmare — peanut butter’s definition took more than a decade — and regulators eventually stopped setting new standards.

That’s part of the reason foods like ketchup have rules, but others like mustard don’t.

The ongoing dispute over yogurt offers a taste of how sour things can get.

The Food and Drug Administra­tion establishe­d a standard for foods labeled as “yogurt” in 1981 that limited its ingredient­s. The industry swiftly objected.

The following year, the agency suspended enforcemen­t on various provisions and allowed the addition of preservati­ves.

A never-finalized 2009 proposal offered a unified standard and allowed emulsifier­s as well.

The yogurt industry says that has cultivated confusion and left it The yogurt industry is hoping to get clearer rules from the Food and Drug Administra­tion of what can be called yogurt. vulnerable to lawsuits.

Adding to the confusion, yogurt makers can opt to follow the 1981, 1982 or 2009 provisions in the absence of a final rule.

In addition to finalizing a yogurt standard, the Internatio­nal Dairy Foods Associatio­n is renewing its push to get rid of the requiremen­t that regular yogurt have at least 3.25 percent milkfat.

It says that causes confusion over products that mix low- fat yogurt with ingredient­s like coconut that push up the fat content.

The resulting product can be called neither “lowfat” nor “yogurt,” the associatio­n says.

Instead, the associatio­n says regular yogurt should simply be required to have more than 3 grams of fat.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States