The Columbus Dispatch

President, flush with joy over pact, goes on a bender

- Dana Milbank writes about political theater for the Washington Post Writers Group. syndicatio­n@washpost.com

North American Free Trade Agreement had given Trump a legitimate reason to crow about a “very, very good,” “terrific,” “amazing,” “incredible” and “historic” deal. But he then opted to take questions on Monday, after aides had signaled he wouldn’t. Inevitably, he trampled his good news with a new rant about the Kavanaugh affair.

He said one of Kavanaugh’s accusers “has very little credibilit­y” and cast doubt on his primary accuser, Christine Blasey Ford: “What day was it? Where was it? Do you know the location?”

Once he got started, Trump couldn’t stop. He complained about “crap” he gets from the news media, saying journalist­s are “loco” (a word he used “because of the fact that we made a deal with Mexico”).

And the president alleged he had seen an unnamed Democratic senator “in very, very bad situations, somewhat compromisi­ng.”

On and on he went — for 90 meandering minutes. Those arrayed behind him in the Rose Garden for the trade announceme­nt fidgeted, bobbed and swayed.

Somewhere in his disorderly mind, Trump had a notion that he needed to keep on the topic of trade. But his hectoring of reporters only distracted further.

When he called on ABC News’ Cecilia Vega, he added that “she’s shocked that I picked her, like in a state of shock.”

Vega protested. “I’m not. Thank you, Mr. President.”

“I know you’re not thinking. You never do,” he said. “I’m sorry?” replied Vega. Just the kind of gratuitous insult of a woman that the White House needed amid the backlash over Kavanaugh’s alleged mistreatme­nt of women.

Trump repeatedly rebuffed Vega and other reporters asking about Kavanaugh, saying he would take those questions later. To his credit, he did. And, when he did, he veered irrevocabl­y off his script.

Watching the president step all over his legitimate trade triumph, I couldn’t help but wonder how things might have turned out differentl­y if he had self-discipline.

Strip away Trump’s zany hyperbole — that “NAFTA was perhaps the worst trade deal ever made” and that his revised trade deal creates a “manufactur­ing powerhouse” where factories never close and workers never lose jobs — and there is much to like about the new deal at first glance: potentiall­y higher wages, tougher labor and environmen­tal standards, a greater proportion of vehicles made in North America.

What if instead of taking the alt-right, nationalis­t path, Trump had, from the beginning, devoted himself to infrastruc­ture rebuilding and trade-pact renegotiat­ion, both broadly popular ideas?

What if he had negotiated a NAFTA replacemen­t without sparking internatio­nal chaos, calling Mexicans murderers and rapists and Canada’s prime minister “very dishonest and weak “?

And what if he had been able to run his administra­tion without the constant distractio­n of corruption, scandal, outrage, division and chaos?

We will never know. Even as Trump celebrated his agreement, he tossed in nonsense claims: U.S. Steel is “building eight or nine plants” and the Obama administra­tion “said we’re not going to have manufactur­ing jobs anymore.” Soon he was talking about bump stocks and the border wall, “fake news,” his “landslide” victory in 2016 and 2018 midterm polls, and how “vocal” Kavanaugh was “about the fact that he likes beer” and the “difficulty” he had with alcohol — everything but what Trump was supposed to be talking about.

Trump’s unpredicta­ble careening from topic to topic is intoxicati­ng to behold. That the president’s mind works this way is sobering.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States