The Columbus Dispatch

Exemptions to birth-control coverage may be expanded

- By Samantha Schmidt

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion is expected to soon issue regulation­s that would expand religious and moral exemptions for covering birth control in employer healthinsu­rance plans, a move that critics say would limit women's access to contracept­ion.

The rules likely would roll back a controvers­ial Obama-era mandate in the Affordable Care Act that required employers to cover birth control. The regulation­s were filed last week for review with the Office of Management and Budget, indicating the administra­tion is in the final stages of issuing the expanded exemptions.

The exact details of the exemptions, and when they would take effect, remain unclear. But women's health advocates are bracing for a legal fight. They expect the rules to mimic earlier regulation­s enacted by the Trump administra­tion last year before being blocked by federal judges.

The rules allowed nearly any employer — nonprofit or for-profit — with a religious or moral objection to opt out of the Affordable Care Act provision requiring the coverage of contracept­ion at no cost to the employee. The rules vastly expanded which companies could be exempt from the mandate and why, including a broad exemption for a “sincerely held moral conviction” not based in any particular religious belief.

Perhaps most significan­tly, it required employers to provide no other accommodat­ions for employees seeking birth-control coverage.

The Trump administra­tion rules were “nothing short of radical,” Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said Thursday. “There's no backstop to ensure coverage for employees.”

The number of companies that would actually opt for such exemptions is unclear. An employee's coverage would depend largely on the employer's insurance plan, as well as the state's laws. Currently, 30 states and the District of Columbia require insurance plans to cover contracept­ives to some extent, with certain exemptions, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. But state laws in those places do not have authority over all plans.

Meanwhile, 20 states have no contracept­ion requiremen­ts for insurance plans.

The birth-control rules are part of a broader effort by conservati­ves inside and outside of the White House to prioritize religious liberty. It also comes in the midst of an ongoing court battle.

Before Trump took office, the Obama administra­tion was facing scores of lawsuits from organizati­ons, such as Hobby Lobby, arguing that the freecontra­ception mandate violated their religious beliefs. The mandate required employers to cover the full range of contracept­ive services approved by the Food and Drug Administra­tion, including emergency contracept­ion and IUDs, without cost-sharing.

After a Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case, the Obama administra­tion allowed religiousl­y affiliated nonprofits and certain private, for-profit corporatio­ns to opt out of the coverage, as long as their employees were provided with an accommodat­ion. The accommodat­ions allowed for women to still get the coverage they needed for birth control, but the company's insurer would pay, not the company itself.

Then, in October 2017, the Trump administra­tion issued its directive significan­tly expanding those exemptions.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States