The Columbus Dispatch

Trump can hardly be to blame for anti-Semitism

- Jay Ambrose is an op-ed columnist for Tribune News Service. Contact him at speaktojay@aol.com

seen Trump as linked to his absurd imagining. Because Trump is so attached to Jews, that’s why. Trump has a daughter who married a Jewish man, converted to Judaism herself and has produced three Jewish children who surely get hugs from a loving grandpa.

Figurative­ly speaking, Trump also hugs millions of Jews in Israel. He has reversed President Barack Obama’s snarling policies by heartily supporting this Jewish nation, as in the United States rightly recognizin­g Jerusalem as its capital.

Oh, that’s a cruel mistake, some said, because they saw this affirmatio­n of an establishe­d fact — and concurrenc­e with U.S. law — as a setback for reaching peace agreements with Palestinia­ns who, excuse me, have threatened Israeli annihilati­on, refused negotiatio­n and abetted terrorism. In a poll, 73 percent of Jewish citizens in Israel said they approve of Trump.

Obviously, critics of Israel, including some of its citizens, are not ipso facto anti-Semitic, but just as obviously attacks on Israel can reflect disgusting­ly bigoted animosity toward Jews. Israel is no more perfect than any other nation. But some disjointed critics come close to equating Israel’s freedom, justice and democratic rule of law with the murderous tyranny, blatant injustice and dictatorsh­ips of its enemies.

In trying to protect itself, Israel is seen by some as being exploitati­vely cruel, and thus we have had boycotts of American companies doing business with Israeli firms seen as abetting the shame of it all. Professors, college students and others have joined in even as a majority of states have said this is repellent. Agreeing with the states are Christian evangelica­ls, deeply religious conservati­ves who tend to like Trump and celebrate Jews as God’s chosen people.

Arguments about Trump’s alleged anti-Semitism, meanwhile, mix misinforma­tion with unshakable bias. For instance, we had liberal pundits excoriatin­g him for talking about internatio­nal bankers in cahoots with Hillary Clinton to do away with our sovereignt­y. Here, they said, was a common, Jewish conspiracy­theory slur, when in fact it was a reference to a Wikileaks revelation of Clinton giving a speech at a Brazilian bank and calling for open borders.

Then there was Trump getting slammed after the Charlottes­ville riot for saying it wasn’t just the neo-Nazis and white supremacis­ts who were violent. Even though it was one of them arrested for killing a woman with his car, violence by the other side was confirmed by news accounts and even the American Civil Liberties Union.

I myself was particular­ly grabbed by a New York Times story that took note of a horrified University of Virginia student who saw a counter- protestor beating an alt- right man with a stick after he was knocked to the ground.

It kind of sounds like what some are now doing to Trump. He could not persuade top Washington officials to go with him to Pittsburgh or to have officials in the state and city greet him there instead of protestors.

Maybe he has earned some of the humiliatio­n, but it is centuries of diseased thought and the killer himself who have taken dear lives and given us this European- style experience of hell — not the president of the United States.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States