The Columbus Dispatch

Excuses for not seeing in-laws don’t add up

- — Just Really Different Write to Carolyn — whose column appears on Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays — at tellme@ washpost.com.

video chatting, and my daughter has no interest in talking on the phone.

The grandparen­ts periodical­ly express some frustratio­n about not having a better relationsh­ip with her, but I’m not sure what I can do. Sending her to visit on her own is not an option; they’re a plane ride away, and their area isn’t a place I would leave a multiracia­l child without parental supervisio­n.

Maybe I’m being obtuse, but, urban/ rural, white-collar/ blue-collar, liberal/ conservati­ve and not being close are emotional apples and oranges.

Maybe there’s more to this? If not — if it’s simply an issue of city versus country mice — then seeing that as extra work versus unworkable could encourage rapprochem­ent.

Also in that case, the strict one-visit-peryear limit seems more cruel and unusual than healthy.

And “no interest in talking on the phone” is not an excuse. Seriously. Now, if we’re to extrapolat­e from “multiracia­l child” that your husband’s position is a boundary he enforces against racial prejudice, then some of this makes sense. But if this were about race, why not mention that right away?

If your husband’s anxiety is about the place and circumstan­ces versus the people, ask him whether you and he have built the guardrails too high.

If his anxiety is about his parents themselves, your obligation is to check in occasional­ly — “Are we handling this right?” — but otherwise support his needs.

I hope he made it clear to his parents why he keeps them at bay. Assuming they should know by now isn’t a substitute for specifics; not knowing why is torture.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States