The Columbus Dispatch

Bid to cut back on home appraisals criticized

- Kenneth R. Harney covers housing issues on Capitol Hill for The Washington Post Writers Group. kenharney@ earthlink.net.

Kenneth R. Harney

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion wants to eliminate profession­al appraisals on a large number of home-sale transactio­ns — a move that critics say could push the country back toward the see-no-evil days of mortgage lending that preceded the housing crash.

Just before Thanksgivi­ng, the administra­tion’s top financial regulators — the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptrolle­r of the Currency — issued a joint proposal that would make traditiona­l appraisals unnecessar­y for many new mortgages originated for less than $400,000.

Instead of a formal appraisal, these homes would receive an “evaluation” by individual­s who have no appraisal licenses or certificat­ion and would not be subject to current state regulatory oversight requiremen­ts that govern appraisers.

The evaluators could be an “independen­t bank employee” or unnamed “third part(ies).” They would, however, have to be “competent” and possess “knowledge of the market, location and type of real property being valued.”

The goal in loosening standards is to lower costs and reduce time in homemortga­ge transactio­ns, according to the agencies. There is already an exemption from mandatory appraisals for new mortgages less than $250,000 when a loan is not intended to be sold to government­backed investors such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, insured by the Federal Housing Administra­tion (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

The new proposal would increase the $250,000 ceiling to $400,000, significan­tly expanding the reach of the no-appraisal approach. The agencies estimate that if their plan had been in place during 2017, about 214,000 home transactio­ns would have been affected. The median existing home price nationwide in October was $255,400, according to the National Associatio­n of Realtors, far below the proposed $400,000 threshold.

Appraisers are reacting to the regulators’ plan with outrage — not surprising given the dent it could leave in their incomes. But appraisers say the issue goes far beyond money and instead gets to the “safety and soundness” responsibi­lities the federal agencies have concerning banks and mortgage lenders. Without a truly independen­t, profession­al valuation of a home — its interior, exterior and recent comparable sales — the door could be open to more loans on houses with inflated appraisals designed to “hit the number” needed by the lender to close the deal.

James L. Murrett, president of the Appraisal Institute, the country’s largest group representi­ng appraisers, says adoption of the plan would represent “a return to the loan production-driven environmen­t seen during the lead-up to the financial crisis, when appraisal and risk management were thrown aside to make more — not better — loans. Apparently, the nation’s bank regulators have learned nothing from that experience.”

Pat Turner, an appraiser active in the Richmond, Virginia, market, told me if the regulators’ goal is to reduce time and costs, they should cut back on the role of “appraisal management companies,” middlemen who add anywhere from 40 percent to 50 percent or more to what the home buyer pays. Management companies are involved in the majority of new mortgage transactio­ns; they choose the appraisers for assignment­s, review the valuation and send it to their lender clients.

When the home buyer is charged $500, Turner says, the appraiser might only be receiving $250, while the management company pockets the other half. Without the middleman, the appraiser might charge $350 — and that’s all the buyer would pay, a $150 saving.

Equally relevant, he says, is that the presence of management companies in the transactio­n inevitably adds “days to the whole process.” Turner also notes that evaluation­s typically do not involve interior inspection­s, so the value estimate is missing a crucial set of observatio­ns. The house might have serious interior or structural damage that lowers its true market value. But if a bank only sees an “evaluation” with no interior inspection, it might well have no clue.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States