The Columbus Dispatch

Like his client, Giuliani is a study in contradict­ions

- Gail Collins Gail Collins writes for The New York Times. Email her at newsservic­e@nytimes.com.

There are a lot of theories about why Rudy Giuliani is still Donald Trump’s attorney. Maybe his crazed, contradict­ory rantings are a canny plot to confuse the public about what’s actually going on with the president’s Russia-connection scandal. Or maybe the fact that Giuliani works for free is more attractive than the fact that he does a dreadful job.

Or maybe it’s just that he is the one person who makes Trump look good.

Sure, both of them contradict themselves every five minutes. But Trump never tries to argue that he can’t be wrong because he’s such a great lawyer.

Both men have been married three times, with a messy history when it comes to adultery, but Trump seems to have calmed down with age. Giuliani is 74, and he’s involved in divorce proceeding­s with his last wife, Judith Nathan, who claims very vigorously that he’s been running around.

“For a variety of reasons that I know as a spouse and a nurse, he has become a different man,” Nathan told New York magazine.

People wondered whether the “nurse” thing was a reference to the fact that Rudy likes to drink. He also smokes — Nathan claimed that her almost-ex had spent about $12,000 over five months in cigars alone.

Trump doesn’t use alcohol or tobacco. See, he’s looking better. Sort of.

Other presidents who’ve gotten in trouble have hired private lawyers, but has there ever been anything quite like this? On Sunday, Giuliani quoted his own client as saying that discussion­s with the Russians over a Trump Moscow hotel were “going on from the day I announced to the day I won.” Take it easy, Mueller investigat­ors. Rudy seems to be doing your job for you.

Then on Monday, Giuliani said everything he told reporters on Sunday was “hypothetic­al.” And anyway, nothing matters as long as you can’t be convicted for it. (“My client didn’t do it, and even if he did it, it’s not a crime.”) The man is certainly a master of the low bar. “Paying $130,000 to Stormy whatever and paying $130,000 to the other one is not a crime,” he said during Trump’s shut-up-the-squeezes period.

The Stormy Daniels payoff was delivered by Trump attorney Michael Cohen. Does this president have great taste in lawyers or what?

Watch Giuliani on TV and you see a man being devoured by egomania. Lawyers are supposed to serve as a screen between their clients and the outside world. If said client is being accused of a crime, their mission is to make the whole matter sound as boring as humanly possible.

Whatever shred of credibilit­y Giuliani still retains is connected to his role as mayor on Sept. 11, when the whole world saw him walking through the dust of the World Trade Center collapse. He needed to get uptown since the city’s emergency management center had been destroyed by the blast. That’s because Giuliani had it located in the WTC — a place that had been targeted for bombing by terrorists in the past — despite vigorous objections from his security advisers. He just sort of wanted it close to City Hall.

Giuliani had already begun to evolve from competent city official to hapless big-time political candidate before the bombing occurred. He tried to run for Senate against Hillary Clinton in what was undoubtedl­y one of the most disaster-ridden campaigns in history. That was the time he held a news conference to announce he was leaving his wife, without mentioning the matter to the spouse in question.

And the beat goes on. During his parade of superstran­ge comments over the past week, he volunteere­d that he’s afraid “it will be on my gravestone: ‘Rudy Giuliani: He lied for Trump.”’

“Somehow I don’t think that will be it,” he added. “But if it is, so what do I care? I’ll be dead.”

What we have here is not a skilled strategist but just another member of the nation’s ever-growing pack of celebritie­s who can’t shut up.

Another one of them, of course, got himself elected president. At least Rudy doesn’t tweet as much.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States