The Columbus Dispatch

Pro-choice resistance minimizes humanity of unborn child

- Kathleen Parker Kathleen Parker is a columnist for The Washington Post. Email her at kathleenpa­rker@ washpost.com.

C.S. Lewis was only partly right when he wrote: “The greatest evil ... is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernail­s and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice.”

Lewis, perhaps, couldn’t have envisioned the day when a law allowing abortion up to the moment of birth would receive a standing ovation, as occurred last month with New York’s passage of the absurdly named “Reproducti­ve Health Act.”

Upon signing the bill, which also permits some health-care profession­als who are not doctors to perform the abortions, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo ordered that One World Trade Center be illuminate­d in pink, hijacking the color associated with saving breast-cancer victims — and the birth of a baby girl.

What a weird, wicked world we live in.

On Jan. 28 in Virginia, Del. Kathy Tran testified on behalf of a bill that would have simplified the process for having a lateterm abortion. Currently, Virginia law requires three doctors’ approval for such a procedure. The bill, which was subsequent­ly tabled, would’ve required only one. This was hardly the stuff of “infanticid­e,” a word that began tumbling from the lips of certain critics, but Gov. Ralph Northam wasn’t helpful. Two days before his yearbook scandal broke, he talked during a radio interview about making distressed newborns “comfortabl­e” while the family decides whether to resuscitat­e.

Meanwhile, lawmakers in Rhode Island, Massachuse­tts, Vermont and other blue states are busy hammering out their own legal concoction­s, likely concerned that Roe v. Wade will be overturned by the nowpredomi­nantly conservati­ve Supreme Court.

Regardless, the pro-choice movement has been preparing for such a frontal assault on the few abortion restrictio­ns left to states. In 1973, when Roe was issued, a baby’s viability was set at 24-28 weeks. Today, thanks to technology and our finer understand­ing of human developmen­t, viability occurs around 22 weeks.

In New York City, where about 2 in 5 pregnancie­s are terminated, there no longer will be any presumptio­n of humanity for the baby at any stage of pregnancy, which goes far beyond abortion jurisprude­nce. Most Americans are fully against such extreme approaches to abortion. One survey puts the share who support abortion during the third trimester at just 13 percent.

Like many if not most Americans, I have been reasonably at ease with President Clinton’s 1996 call for making abortion “safe, legal and rare,” but had hoped we’d seriously pursue that goal through better informatio­n and limit abortion to the first trimester. But the pro-choice side has resisted many attempts to educate. Activists have opposed laws requiring that pregnant women have the option of viewing a sonogram before their abortion. They’ve also thwarted attempts to make adoption resources available at abortion clinics.

What are they afraid of? That someone may change her mind?

No one wants women to be subjected to last resorts. But nor should we be celebratin­g laws that ignore the humanity of an unborn child. While there are only four doctors in the U.S. who perform third-trimester abortions and, obviously, “no one gets an abortion on the delivery table,” as New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg put it, the codificati­on of late-term abortion should be discomfiti­ng.

It is obvious, meanwhile, that these pro-abortion legislator­s’ new efforts are aimed at undoing, one by one, the state-level “victories” of their pro-life counterpar­ts — even, apparently, if it means putting women’s lives at greater risk by allowing nondoctors to perform abortions.

But more concerning than a possible increase in late-term abortions (now at fewer than 2 percent of all pregnancy terminatio­ns) is the clinical way we’ve come to view and discuss human life. When we use language to disguise reality — whether the developing human baby is a “clump of cells,” a “fetus,” or, even, a “product of terminatio­n” — we move ever-closer to the dehumaniza­tion of us all.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States