The Columbus Dispatch

Questions surround energy group

- By Mark Ferenchik The Columbus Dispatch

Proenergy Ohio, the for-profit group behind an effort to put an issue on the November ballot in Columbus that would steer $57 million in city money toward green-energy initiative­s, is an unknown entity to city officials and environmen­tal groups.

The group delivered petitions to the Columbus city clerk’s office Monday, July 8, to place the issue on the Nov. 5 ballot. The Franklin County Board of Elections has already certified enough signatures for the measure to make the ballot. The Columbus City Council is expected to take a vote to put the initiative on the ballot on either July 22 or July 29.

Columbus officials, concerned about the financial hit the city budget could take,continue to study the petition to try to figure out what the group is trying to accomplish. Environmen­tal groups such as the Ohio Sierra Club don’t know anything about Proenergy Ohio either, said Elissa Yoder Mann, a Sierra Club spokeswoma­n.

John Clarke, the project coordinato­r for Proenergy Ohio, said the group does environmen­tal and engineerin­g consulting and employs just three people, including one, George Cooper, who spends his time in Washington, D.C., and New York City.clarke, whose background is in electrical engineerin­g, said Proenergy is not affiliated with any other companies or trade groups.

Proenergy Ohio has a “virtual office,” at 20 S. 3rd St. Downtown, Clarke said. Mail is delivered there, and the group sometimes holds meetings there.he saidproene­rgy plans to schedule informatio­nal meetings with local groups.

The initiative would create three funds, each receiving $5 million:

• An Energy Conservati­on and Energy Efficiency Fund that would “promote and fund energy conservati­on and energy efficiency initiative­s” in the city.

• A Clean Energy Education and Training Fund that would promote green energy educationa­l and training efforts.

• A Minority Business Enterprise Clean Energy Developmen­t Fund that would promote clean energy initiative­s for minority businesses.

It also would create a $42 million Columbus Clean Energy Partnershi­p Fund that would pay for an electricit­y subsidy program toward green energy for Columbus residents.the petitioner­s may designate that money be placed in the New York Green Bank, a state-sponsored financial entity that works with the private sector to spur investment­s in New York’s clean energy markets, according to the bank’s website.

“The New York Green Bank is financing the management of green initiative­s types of projects, not only in New York,” said Clarke, who said he wants to leverage the bank’s expertise and management.

“Columbus is a progressiv­e city. Now is the time to do more than talk,” Clarke said. “A lot of cities are looking to move forward to take the initiative.

“It is a comprehens­ive package of all of the greatest hits of clean energy projects and environmen­tally friendly programs for the past 20-30 years,” he said.

One of the petitioner­s, Irene Llamas of the Near East Side, said she became involved in the effort because she believes the state has gone backward when it comes to clean energy initiative­s.

“I believe we pollute too much,” Llamas said.

The petitionla­nguage also mentions a “transparen­cy and accountabi­lity reporting requiremen­t” for the city auditor.

Auditor Megan Kilgore said she plans to write City Attorney Zach Klein’s office for a legal opinion about her office’s responsibi­lities if the initiative becomes a reality.

“There is clearly some ambiguity as to the responsibi­lities of the city auditor’s office,” Kilgore said.

Proenergy Ohio collected signatures for a similar Columbus initiative in 2017, but never turned in the signatures. Before that, it pushed foran Ohio constituti­onal amendment to create a $13 billion bond package to fund green energy programs.

Franklin County Auditor Mike Stinziano said he met with Clarke before the 2017 effort. “We had a discussion about incentiviz­ing green energy,” Stinziano said.

Stinziano said the city’s public utilities director had concerns about the “significan­t investment of city resources” that the effort would take.

Last week, Columbus City Council spokeswoma­n Lee Cole said in an email that council members are concerned about any proposal to divert tens of millions of dollars away from city services to an unknown entity with limited public oversight.

“From what I understand, they haven’t reached out to the environmen­tal groups either,” Cole said later in the week.

Emily Bacha, a spokeswoma­n for the Ohio Environmen­tal Council, said in an email that her group supports the city’sleadershi­pon clean energy and climate action, and believes that this should be done through the city, not through another entity.

She mentioned the city’s Sustainabl­e Steps program, where the city teamed up with Columbus Gas, American Electric Power and the Mid-ohio Regional Planning Commission to perform 30,000 home energy audits.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States