White supremacist policymakers, terrorists on same team
of anti-semitic, sexist and white supremacist ideology. The book glorifies ‘Aryan’ men, condemns intermarriage between races, and defends violence based on bogus eugenicist tropes.’’
Saturday, a 21-year-old white man identified by the police as Patrick Crusius walked into a crowded Walmart in El Paso and opened fire, killing 20 people and wounding more than two dozen others, some children. It was a massacre.
As The New York Times reported, ‘‘Nineteen minutes before the first 911 call’’ about the shooting at the Walmart, ‘‘a hatefilled, anti-immigrant manifesto appeared online.’’ CNN reports that authorities are investigating the racist screed which ‘‘police believe’’ was posted by Crusius.
The manifesto is heavily anti-immigrant and antihispanic. It’s riddled with the fear of white ‘‘displacement’’ and fear that changing demographics will favor Democrats and turn America into ‘‘a one party-state.’’
And then on Sunday, a 24-year-old man named Connor Betts opened fire in Dayton, Ohio, killing nine people and injuring at least 27 others. Most of those killed were black.
Are these shootings a gun control issue? Of course. We have too many guns and too many high-capacity guns. We sell guns first designed for soldiers to civilians. We don’t do enough to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them, and we do next to nothing to track guns once they are sold.
Is this stochastic terrorism at play in which rhetoric by some incites action by others? Possibly.
There is no doubt that President Donald Trump and Republicans are making poisonous anti-immigrant rhetoric part of their platforms.
But, I think laying all the blame at their feet is too convenient and simplistic.
I think a better way to look at it is to understand that white nationalist terrorists — young and rash — and white nationalist policymakers — older and more methodical — live on parallel planes, both aiming in the same direction, both with the same goal: To maintain and ensure white dominance and white supremacy.
The policymakers believe they can accomplish with legislation in the legal system what the terrorists are trying to underscore with lead. In the minds of the policymakers, border walls, anti-immigrant laws, voter suppression and packing the courts are more prudent and permanent than bodies in the streets. But, try telling that to a young white terrorist who distrusts everyone in Washington.
As the writer of the El Paso manifesto points out, ‘‘the Republican Party is also terrible.’’ The writer goes on to explain:
‘‘Many factions within the Republican Party are pro-corporation. Pro-corporation = proimmigration. But some factions within the Republican Party don’t prioritize corporations over our future. So the Democrats are nearly unanimous with their support of immigration while the Republicans are divided over it. At least with Republicans, the process of mass immigration and citizenship can be greatly reduced.’’
This is a reason these groups are often at odds.
The white nationalist policymakers are annoyed and even incensed by the terrorists because they believe they besmirch the mission.
These terrorists want to do quickly what the policymakers insist must be done slowly, so the terrorists stew in their anger.
They are angry at immigrants because their numbers are ascendant — through both immigration and higher birthrates — and, those immigrants threaten an even more accelerated displacement of white people from a numerical majority.
They are angry at white liberals for courting the demise of white supremacy. They are angry at liberal white women in particular for championing a woman’s right to choose and for not having more babies.
They are angry at black people for even existing.
Violence is the way the white terrorists respond to demographic shifts and demographic terror.
It’s not simply a matter of whether Trump’s rhetoric, or that of any other politician, led these shooters to do what they did. Maybe.
It is also about recognizing that all these people are on the same team and share the same mission and eat from the same philosophical trough. It’s just that their methods differ. The white supremacist terrorists and the white supremacist policymakers are bound at the hip.