The Columbus Dispatch

Huntington’s 2nd-quarter profits take hit

- Mark Williams Mark Williams

The coronaviru­s pandemic has taken a big bite out of Huntington Bancshares’ bottom line.

Some of the bank’s employees will lose their job as a result.

The bank reported Thursday that its profit slipped 59% during the Apriljune quarter from a year ago, falling to $150 million, or 13 cents per share.

Later Thursday, the bank announced it is cutting about 1% of its workforce, about 150 jobs total, throughout its Midwest footprint as a way to reduce costs because of the pandemic. In addition, the bank said some open jobs won’t be filled.

“While our business continues to perform well, the pandemic has caused historical­ly low interest rates and a recession, which has impacted our revenue. In response, Huntington has taken a variety of measures to manage these challenges, including reducing expenses by adjusting staffing levels,” the bank said in a statement.

The 13 cents per share profit was about twice what analysts were expecting, and Huntington shares jumped about 5% in trading Thursday afternoon. Shares, though, remain well off their high of the past year of $15.63.

Revenue for the quarter was $1.2 billion, about flat versus the same period in 2019.

Huntington’s profit tumbled in reaction to the economic downturn caused by the pandemic, with the bank bolstering its reserves to cover potential loan losses. It was a quarter marked by dramatic changes and uncertaint­y for customers, said Steve Steinour, the bank’s chairman, president and CEO.

The pandemic sent unemployme­nt soaring and stock markets tumbling early on.

“We wanted to try and keep the communicat­ion going and help where we can,” he said. The bank has been waiving fees and deferring loan payments for customers and business clients.

With Firstenerg­y Corp. and its former subsidiari­es implicated in a public corruption scandal, market analysts are sharing varying degrees of concern for the economic toll two of Akron’s biggest employers could pay.

Racketeeri­ng charges filed Tuesday against lobbyists and lawmakers, who allegedly took donations in exchange for a $1 billion energy bailout bill, all but named Firstenerg­y and its former power-generation subsidiary Firstenerg­y Solutions as the source of the cash.

Firstenerg­y Solutions is now Energy Harbor after emerging in February from Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Now two companies with headquarte­rs in Akron and thousands of employees in multiple states, Firstenerg­y Corp. and Energy Harbor say they’re reviewing the criminal complaint and cooperatin­g with federal investigat­ors.

Neither will talk about the potential impact on business or investor confidence.

Stock prices for both companies are off by a third since the scandal broke. Subpoenas announced Tuesday evening for Firstenerg­y followed the morning arrests of Ohio Speaker of the House Larry Householde­r, former GOP Chairman Matt Borges and three top statehouse lobbyists. The men and Generation Now, a dark money group that investigat­ors believe Householde­r used to conceal Firstenerg­y donations, are being charged with racketeeri­ng.

Political backlash could be especially costly for Energy Harbor, which is depending on the controvers­ial state bailout signed into law last year. Two Republican­s and several Democrats said Wednesday that they intend to claw back the subsidy.

The repeal of House Bill 6, which Gov. Mike Dewine said Wednesday he would not support, could rewind the clock for Energy Harbor to March 29, 2018, when — then operating as Firstenerg­y Solutions — the Davisbesse nuclear power plant was scheduled for decommissi­on in May 2020 followed by the Perry Nuclear Power Plant in 2021. Struggling to compete with cheap natural gas, the plants each employ about 700 people.

Firstenerg­y Solutions filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy two days later, on March 31, 2018. That July, Firstenerg­y Solutions arranged but did not follow through with the sale of its retail and wholesale electricit­y business to Constellat­ion, a subsidiary of Chicagobas­ed energy giant Exelon.

By 2019, the financial outlook improved. A bankruptcy settlement was reached in October.

Firstenerg­y shareholde­r dividends increased 5.6% in 2019, the first increase since falling 35% in 2014, according to Charles Fishman, an equity analyst at market research firm Morningsta­r.

With monthly revenue of about $150 million, Energy Harbor values itself post-bankruptcy at $1.2 billion, according to a March financial report.

The company serves 900,000 customers with nuclear and coal-fired power plants in Ohio, Pennsylvan­ia and West Virginia, and employs 2,600 workers — including 1,000 under collective bargaining agreements.

Analysts say solar, wind and other renewable sources could feasibly replace the electrical output of Energy Harbor’s two nuclear power plants, which currently provide the bulk of Ohio’s zero emission energy.

Among the nation’s largest investorow­ned utility companies, Firstenerg­y Corp. provides electricit­y to 6 million customers through 10 subsidiari­es, including Ohio Edison, Cleveland Electric Illuminati­ng and Toledo Edison in Ohio.

About 36 hours since news broke of the public scandal Tuesday morning, Energy Harbor stock fell 33.5%, from $35.35 to $27.09 at market’s close Wednesday. Firstenerg­y Corp. stock fell 35% over the two trading sessions, from $41.64 at the opening bell Tuesday to $27.09 by Wednesday’s end.

Firstenerg­y is scheduled to release its financial results for its April-june quarter Thursday afternoon. A conference call with analysts to discuss the financial results will be held Friday morning.

Analysts say the arrests have created uncertaint­y about Firstenerg­y and where the investigat­ion about House Bill 6 is going.

“We are concerned about the potential implicatio­ns for (Firstenerg­y), which we find impossible to predict with any degree of certainty at this juncture,” Keybanc analyst Sophie Karp said in a research note released Tuesday.

More charges could be coming. Karp said phone calls and contributi­ons detailed in the criminal complaint suggest “some degree of collusion between Company A (Firstenerg­y) and ‘the Enterprise’ of (House Speaker Larry Householde­r) and his associates.”

“We expect share volatility near term for Firstenerg­y Corp., but believe additional details will be needed on the specifics of the case to determine where the risks lie,” analyst Paige Meyer said.

Fishman with Morningsta­r said the investigat­ion is problemati­c for

Firstenerg­y. But he said investors are overreacti­ng.

“I’ve been doing this for a long time. What am I missing?” he said.

Firstenerg­y’s Ohio operations are 20% of all operating earnings, which cover operations all the way to Maryland. And Firstenerg­y’s Ohio utility rates are locked in until at least 2024, which provides some predictabi­lity.

“We also find it hard to believe that Firstenerg­y’s management was directly involved in any bribery scheme with respect to HB 6,” he said in a research note Tuesday. “Although Firstenerg­y CEO Chuck Jones had been very vocal in his support for the legislatio­n, his support was based on his belief that the nuclear plants were important to Ohio, the communitie­s in which they were located, and the plant employees. When passed, HB 6 had minimal benefit for Firstenerg­y or Jones.”

Still, the revelation could harm Firstenerg­y’s relationsh­ip with regulators and legislator­s in Ohio. Jones, the CEO and president, already has been talking about retiring.

“It will be messy. It does not look good for them,” said Fishman, who kept his $44 price target on Firstenerg­y shares.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States